Posers and Puzzles
Germany
- Joined
- 27 Oct '08
- Moves
- 3118
What is the next number in the following sequence?
0
1
2
2.60121894356579510020490322708104361119152187501694... x 10^1746 (approximation)
RHP Arms
- Joined
- 09 Jun '07
- Moves
- 48793
Originally posted by KazetNagorra
What is the next number in the following sequence?
0
1
2
2.60121894356579510020490322708104361119152187501694... x 10^1746 (approximation)
42 (approximation)
Germany
- Joined
- 27 Oct '08
- Moves
- 3118
Originally posted by wolfgang59
42 (approximation)
42 is
not the answer!
- Joined
- 26 Apr '03
- Moves
- 26771
Hmm, the answer seems to depend on whether the sequence is:
1!
2!!
3!!!
or
1!!!
2!!!
3!!!
which give the same answers up to the third value, which is all we have.
Removed- Joined
- 10 Dec '06
- Moves
- 8528
Originally posted by iamatiger
Hmm, the answer seems to depend on whether the sequence is:
1!
2!!
3!!!
or
1!!!
2!!!
3!!!
which give the same answers up to the third value, which is all we have.
the 0 in the sequence gives the solution
cant be 0!!! =1, thus the first term must be zero
so
0
1!
2!!
3!!!
4!!!!
nice catch
Germany
- Joined
- 27 Oct '08
- Moves
- 3118
4!!!! is the correct answer.
Or written alternatively: 10^(10^(10^25.16114896940657)).
- Joined
- 11 Nov '05
- Moves
- 43938
Originally posted by KazetNagorra
4!!!! is the correct answer.
Or written alternatively: 10^(10^(10^25.16114896940657)).
A good one! 🙂
I just thought the problem as silly at first, but now I enjoy the problem, and its solution!
Removed- Joined
- 10 Dec '06
- Moves
- 8528
Originally posted by KazetNagorra
4!!!! is the correct answer.
Or written alternatively: 10^(10^(10^25.16114896940657)).
Is there a general series definition for this? I tried to develop one but my head exploded.
🙂
Germany
- Joined
- 27 Oct '08
- Moves
- 3118
Originally posted by joe shmo
Is there a general series definition for this? I tried to develop one but my head exploded.
🙂
I have no idea, this is just what Wolfram Alpha gave me.
- Joined
- 26 Apr '03
- Moves
- 26771
Originally posted by KazetNagorra
I have no idea, this is just what Wolfram Alpha gave me.
Looking at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factorial
Wolfram may be using the equation given under "multifactorials", which uses k as "the number of exclamation marks.
Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree