1. Joined
    05 Jun '07
    Moves
    906
    03 Jan '08 01:531 edit
    How many queens of the same color can you put on an standard chessboard so that none of them attack each other?

    (Hint 1: The answer isn't 8.)
    (Hint 2: Read the question very carefully.)

    I might put the answer in 24 hours or when I feel like it. Someone will probably get the answer first though.
  2. Earth Prime
    Joined
    16 Mar '05
    Moves
    21936
    03 Jan '08 03:29
    uh 64? queens of the same color don't attack each other.
  3. SubscriberAThousandYoung
    All My Soldiers...
    tinyurl.com/y9ls7wbl
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    24791
    03 Jan '08 04:581 edit
    Originally posted by twilight2007
    How many queens of the same color can you put on an standard chessboard so that none of them attack each other?

    (Hint 1: The answer isn't 8.)
    (Hint 2: Read the question very carefully.)

    I might put the answer in 24 hours or when I feel like it. Someone will probably get the answer first though.
    64 with Kings off the board. 63 leaves room for one King, but in any game you can only have 9 Queens of the same color.

    With both Kings, you need to make sure the position is legal. THAT'S where the problem could get interesting. I'm too lazy to do it.

    Would you clarify exactly what you're asking? Do they have to arrive by legal game means? Do they have to look like a Queen or can they be pennies or upside down Rooks? If not, then the answer is 1 unless you have multiple sets.
  4. Standard memberskeeter
    515 + 30 days
    Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Mar '03
    Moves
    38202
    03 Jan '08 05:25
    Originally posted by Coconut
    uh 64? queens of the same color don't attack each other.
    I'm in that camp.

    Jesus wept

    skeeter
  5. SubscriberAThousandYoung
    All My Soldiers...
    tinyurl.com/y9ls7wbl
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    24791
    03 Jan '08 10:191 edit
    Actually, it depends on the size of the base of the Queen, and the size of the chessboard. Since we're not actually following Chess rules we don't have to put exactly one Queen per square.

    Also depends if you can stack them up without them falling over.
  6. Standard membercelticcountry
    Copyright ©2001-2006
    Eastbourne
    Joined
    20 Sep '04
    Moves
    16434
    03 Jan '08 11:38
    64 Definative answer, It must be 64, because, A queen is never in a state of "Attacking " herself.
  7. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    03 Jan '08 11:42
    Originally posted by celticcountry
    64 Definative answer, It must be 64, because, A queen is never in a state of "Attacking " herself.
    The answer "64 queens" implies that you have to obay some standard rules of chess, but not others. Why's that?

    The question was "How many queens of the same color can you put on an standard chessboard so that none of them attack each other?" and no other rules are attached with the question - the answer must be something like "several hundreds if you pile them up".

    Who says that there has to be maximum one queen per square?
  8. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    03 Jan '08 22:101 edit
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    With both Kings, you need to make sure the position is legal. THAT'S where the problem could get interesting. I'm too lazy to do it.
    If Queens of same color do not attack each other:

  9. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    03 Jan '08 22:224 edits
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    With both Kings, you need to make sure the position is legal. THAT'S where the problem could get interesting. I'm too lazy to do it.
    If we don't allow Queens to even 'observe' each other:

  10. Brooklyn
    Joined
    27 Dec '07
    Moves
    4670
    03 Jan '08 23:43
    16 just put a pawn buffer on all sides of them
  11. Joined
    05 Jun '07
    Moves
    906
    04 Jan '08 00:331 edit
    Hmm, I guess I need to work on my puzzle-making and/or explanation skills. I guess I shouldn't have assumed that only one piece can be placed on each square and that the position didn't have to be legal.

    The answer was 64.
  12. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    04 Jan '08 06:39
    Originally posted by twilight2007
    Hmm, I guess I need to work on my puzzle-making and/or explanation skills. I guess I shouldn't have assumed that only one piece can be placed on each square and that the position didn't have to be legal.

    The answer was 64.
    It's the word 'attack' - only the rules of chess give the Queen the ability to 'attack' anything.
  13. Standard membercelticcountry
    Copyright ©2001-2006
    Eastbourne
    Joined
    20 Sep '04
    Moves
    16434
    04 Jan '08 11:11
    Originally posted by twilight2007
    Hmm, I guess I need to work on my puzzle-making and/or explanation skills. I guess I shouldn't have assumed that only one piece can be placed on each square and that the position didn't have to be legal.

    The answer was 64.
    No my friend, your explanation skills need no fine tuning, A perfect puzzle cunningly constructed , it threw (almost) everyone off the correct trail.

    You truly are a master of puzzles, I look forward to your next submission.

    CC
  14. Cavan, Ireland
    Joined
    30 Apr '07
    Moves
    3516
    10 Jan '08 21:36
    Originally posted by celticcountry
    No my friend, your explanation skills need no fine tuning, A perfect puzzle cunningly constructed , it threw (almost) everyone off the correct trail.

    You truly are a master of puzzles, I look forward to your next submission.

    CC
    You hit the nail on hte nail bro - hit the nail on the head
  15. Standard membereldragonfly
    leperchaun messiah
    thru a glass onion
    Joined
    19 Apr '03
    Moves
    16866
    10 Jan '08 22:211 edit
Back to Top