Posers and Puzzles

Posers and Puzzles

  1. Standard memberroyalchicken
    CHAOS GHOST!!!
    Elsewhere
    Joined
    29 Nov '02
    Moves
    17317
    23 Jul '03 18:01
    This is not mine. Sorry for the failure of narrative. Suppose:

    3 = 2/x(1) - x(1) + 2/x(2) - x(2) + ... +2/x(n) -x(n)+....

    What is x(n) in terms of n?
  2. DonationChessNut
    Lightly Salted...
    Joined
    18 Jul '01
    Moves
    36979
    23 Jul '03 20:021 edit
    Originally posted by royalchicken
    This is not mine. Sorry for the failure of narrative. Suppose:

    3 = 2/x(1) - x(1) + 2/x(2) - x(2) + ... +2/x(n) -x(n)+....

    What is x(n) in terms of n?
    x is an integer that when used within the equation in question the calculated result would come out as '3' and not '2' and not '1' unless you move onto '2' when you shall not stop there as you shall move immediately to '3'. Once you get to '3' you shall toss the Holy Handgrenade and all of your enemies shall perish...

    Sorry, anybody need any snacks? πŸ˜›
  3. Standard memberPhlabibit
    Mystic Meg
    tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4
    Joined
    27 Mar '03
    Moves
    17242
    24 Jul '03 23:10219 edits
    Originally posted by ChessNut
    x is an integer that when used within the equation in question the calculated result would come out as '3' and not '2' and not '1' unless you move onto '2' when you shall not stop there as you shall move immediately to '3'. Once ...[text shortened]... our enemies shall perish...

    Sorry, anybody need any snacks? πŸ˜›
    Certainly Never 5!!!!!!

    Got any spam?

    EDIT
    [i]did I spell spam right?
  4. Amsterdam
    Joined
    26 Jan '03
    Moves
    27540
    28 Jul '03 21:57
    Originally posted by Phlabibit
    Certainly Never 5!!!!!!

    Got any spam?

    [b]EDIT

    [i]did I spell spam right?[/b]
    Erhm...Phla....have you edited your post 219 times??? Or is it just my computer...πŸ˜•πŸ˜•πŸ˜•πŸ˜•

    Olav
  5. my own little world
    Joined
    13 Sep '02
    Moves
    1819
    28 Jul '03 23:30
    Well if its your computer, then it must be mine too. That sure is a lot of editsπŸ™‚.

    As to the problem at hand. maybe in the morning, my brain doesn't like maths at the momentπŸ™‚.

    James
  6. Standard memberPhlabibit
    Mystic Meg
    tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4
    Joined
    27 Mar '03
    Moves
    17242
    29 Jul '03 00:59
    yeah, took me a bit to get that post right......

    πŸ˜‰
  7. DonationAcolyte
    Now With Added BA
    Loughborough
    Joined
    04 Jul '02
    Moves
    3790
    01 Aug '03 18:091 edit
    Originally posted by royalchicken
    This is not mine. Sorry for the failure of narrative. Suppose:

    3 = 2/x(1) - x(1) + 2/x(2) - x(2) + ... +2/x(n) -x(n)+....

    What is x(n) in terms of n?
    How about:

    x(n) = 1 if n=1,2 or 3
    x(n) = sqrt(2) otherwise

    NOTE: There are clearly an infinite number of solutions, so I assume you're just looking for one.
  8. Standard memberroyalchicken
    CHAOS GHOST!!!
    Elsewhere
    Joined
    29 Nov '02
    Moves
    17317
    02 Aug '03 22:501 edit
    Originally posted by Acolyte
    How about:

    x(n) = 1 if n=1,2 or 3
    x(n) = sqrt(2) otherwise

    NOTE: There are clearly an infinite number of solutions, so I assume you're just looking for one.
    Good going πŸ˜€. This was the same solution I found first....actually this was on a STEP exam that I downloaded at your suggestion....
  9. Standard memberFiathahel
    Artist in Drawing
    in your fridge
    Joined
    21 May '03
    Moves
    9766
    14 Aug '03 13:22
    Originally posted by Acolyte
    How about:

    x(n) = 1 if n=1,2 or 3
    x(n) = sqrt(2) otherwise

    NOTE: There are clearly an infinite number of solutions, so I assume you're just looking for one.
    sorry to bother you, but

    sqrt(2) - sqrt(2) + sqrt(2) - sqrt(2) + sqrt(2) - sqrt(2) + ...

    aint summable (if that is the correct english word for 'sommeerbaar'πŸ˜‰

    Cause it would be the same as
    [sqrt(2) - sqrt(2)] + [sqrt(2) - sqrt(2)] + [sqrt(2) - sqrt(2)] + ...
    = 0 + 0 + 0 ... = 0
    and as
    sqrt(2) + [-sqrt(2) + sqrt(2)] + [-sqrt(2) + sqrt(2)] + ....
    = sqrt(2) + 0 + 0 + ... = sqrt(2)



    If my thinking is rigth there aint a solution to this question cause therefor the sequence
    2/x(1), -x(1), 2/x(2), -x(2), 2/x(3), -x(3), ...
    should converge to 0. But that can't be done cause 2/x(n) or x(n) is greater then 1 for all n.
  10. DonationAcolyte
    Now With Added BA
    Loughborough
    Joined
    04 Jul '02
    Moves
    3790
    14 Aug '03 16:111 edit
    Originally posted by Fiathahel
    sorry to bother you, but

    sqrt(2) - sqrt(2) + sqrt(2) - sqrt(2) + sqrt(2) - sqrt(2) + ...

    aint summable (if that is the correct english word for 'sommeerbaar'πŸ˜‰

    Cause it would be the same as
    [sqrt(2) - sqrt(2)] + [sqrt(2) - sqr ...[text shortened]... can't be done cause 2/x(n) or x(n) is greater then 1 for all n.
    That's a good point, and it emphasises the importance of specifying exactly what is tending to infinity. I read the expression in the question as 'the sum from t=1 to n of 2/x(t) - x(t) tends to 3 as n tends to infinity.' In this case, my example is equal to 3 for all n >= 3 and so the series tends to 3.

    If, on the other hand, you interpret the '=' as 'the sum tends to 3 as the number of terms tends to infinity', where a term is either 2/x(n) or -x(n) for some n, then the expression is indeed impossible.
  11. Standard memberroyalchicken
    CHAOS GHOST!!!
    Elsewhere
    Joined
    29 Nov '02
    Moves
    17317
    14 Aug '03 20:03
    The first interpretaion is the one I assume the STEP examiner intended. What Acolyte's answer basically says is that lim (n->infinity) 1-1 = 0, and Fiathahel quite rightly says that 1-1+1-1+1-1+1... is meaningless unless the nth term is defined. The same is true of any conditionally convergent series in that rearrangement of terms is not allowed. Leibniz wrote on this one.
Back to Top