09 Sep '04 09:47>
We are all more or less on the same page
as to what a sheep is.
I have, though, been involved in a discussion
with one of my fiends for the longest of times, years,
as to how to define a NOT-sheep. (yes we are both sick)
(It started of as an observation in a C program of his
with a line like: if(!Sheep=false) )
Do anyone here have any fun ideas?
The main paradox we've found is this:
A NOT-sheep is an entity which possesses
all characteristics not possessed by a sheep.
This leads to the question of whether its possible to
exactly define a sheep in such a way that no nonsheep is
contained in the set, and all acctual sheep must be
accounted for. If this can not be done then it must
per definition be possible to define a NOT-sheep.....
Thoughts?
as to what a sheep is.
I have, though, been involved in a discussion
with one of my fiends for the longest of times, years,
as to how to define a NOT-sheep. (yes we are both sick)
(It started of as an observation in a C program of his
with a line like: if(!Sheep=false) )
Do anyone here have any fun ideas?
The main paradox we've found is this:
A NOT-sheep is an entity which possesses
all characteristics not possessed by a sheep.
This leads to the question of whether its possible to
exactly define a sheep in such a way that no nonsheep is
contained in the set, and all acctual sheep must be
accounted for. If this can not be done then it must
per definition be possible to define a NOT-sheep.....
Thoughts?