Posers and Puzzles
Mansfield, England
- Joined
- 14 Jul '07
- Moves
- 4772
White to move. Is mate possible here in
five moves or under?
What do you see?
Edit:
Don't scroll down if you want to solve it yourself!- Joined
- 12 Mar '03
- Moves
- 44411
Checkmate in 4:
1.Qf5! threatens Nf4#; only three moves to stop that
a) 1. ... Bxd5 eliminating the knight
b) & c) 1. ... Qb8 or 1. ... Bd6, covering f5
After each of these, the second threat 2.Rxg4! is deadly
a) 2.Rxg4 any move 3.Rh4#
b) & c) 2.Rxg4 Qxg3+ (or Bxg3) 3.fxg3 any move 4.Rh4#
Mansfield, England
- Joined
- 14 Jul '07
- Moves
- 4772
Originally posted by Mephisto2
Checkmate in 4:
1.Qf5! threatens Nf4#; only three moves to stop that
a) 1. ... Bxd5 eliminating the knight
b) & c) 1. ... Qb8 or 1. ... Bd6, covering f5
After each of these, the second threat 2.Rxg4! is deadly
a) 2.Rxg4 any move 3.Rh4#
b) & c) 2.Rxg4 Qxg3+ (or Bxg3) 3.fxg3 any move 4.Rh4#
You were quick of the mark matey.
Very nicely done 🙂
Sigulda, Latvia
- Joined
- 30 Aug '06
- Moves
- 4048
Actually mate is possible in 2 moves. 1. h3 Qg6 2. Qxg4# But that's if both players cooperate.
- Joined
- 05 Jun '07
- Moves
- 906
I assumed the original poster ment forced mate, meaning no cooperation.
2014.05.01
- Joined
- 11 Apr '07
- Moves
- 92274
Originally posted by twilight2007
I assumed the original poster ment forced mate, meaning no cooperation.
The word "possible" led to the confusion. It is possible to lose a game of chess in only two moves, but not forced.
Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree