Sudoku question

Sudoku question

Posers and Puzzles

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Krackpot Kibitzer

Right behind you...

Joined
27 Apr 02
Moves
16879
22 Jun 05

I tried and solved my first (easy) Sudoku puzzle recently. It set me to wondering however: What is fewest number of initial entries into a 9 x 9 sudoku grid that permit such a puzzle to be solved? I suspect the number can be formally arrived at, but I don't know how. Any takers?

Aiden

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
22 Jun 05

On the sudoku site the puzzles there show either 3 or 4 numbers
in each sub grid. So your only possiblity is 1 or 2 as smaller, not
much of a range. 1 you could eliminate as allowing many solutions
so the idea is to figure out if 2 in each grid could be set up
to have only one solution, I think not. I think with 2 in each grid you
have many more solutions so it looks to me like 3 and 4 are the
minimum already.

P
Upward Spiral

Halfway

Joined
02 Aug 04
Moves
8702
22 Jun 05

17 is the answer.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
22 Jun 05

Originally posted by Palynka
17 is the answer.
I had considered that, as well as 69 but the philosophical implications
stymied me from venturing a valid logically unimpeachable arguement
considered as a devils advocacy type of involvement with the
fundamental numerical formulations.

TP
Leak-Proof

under the sink

Joined
08 Aug 04
Moves
12493
22 Jun 05

Originally posted by Palynka
17 is the answer.
Huh uh...42. You should know that!

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
22 Jun 05
1 edit

+ 3 + + + + 9 + +
6 + + 4 + + + + +
+ + + + + + 7 + +
+ 7 + 2 9 + + + +
+ + + 3 + + + 6 +
+ + + + + + + 4 +
4 + + + + 5 + 8 +
+ + + + 7 + 3 + +
+ + 1 + + + + + +

OK I doubt this will work. But there is a 17 number setup with a unique solution. No 16 numbers setups with unique solutions have been discovered but they haven't been shown not to exist.

EDIT: Well it worked kind of.

TP
Leak-Proof

under the sink

Joined
08 Aug 04
Moves
12493
22 Jun 05

Oh, you meant 17 was the answer to the Soduku thing, I was thinking of Life, the Universe, and Everything.

nevermind....😀

P
Upward Spiral

Halfway

Joined
02 Aug 04
Moves
8702
22 Jun 05

Originally posted by The Plumber
Oh, you meant 17 was the answer to the Soduku thing, I was thinking of Life, the Universe, and Everything.

nevermind....😀
The answer to that is, of course, the answer to the Soduku thing added to the number of months of the year and a lot of bad luck.

That's how I got to the answer to the Soduku thing

42 = 12 + 13 + X
X = 17

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
22 Jun 05

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
+ 3 + + + + 9 + +
6 + + 4 + + + + +
+ + + + + + 7 + +
+ 7 + 2 9 + + + +
+ + + 3 + + + 6 +
+ + + + + + + 4 +
4 + + + + 5 + 8 +
+ + + + 7 + 3 + +
+ + 1 + + + + ...[text shortened]... have been discovered but they haven't been shown not to exist.

EDIT: Well it worked kind of.
well that blows my 3 and 4 thing. The puzzle I saw on the sudoku
site had 6 3's and 3 4's (30) It just seemed to allow more
solutions if you had less occupied squares.
So the key is the *position* in the squares.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
22 Jun 05

check out this site:
http://www.shef.ac.uk/~pm1afj/sudoku/

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
22 Jun 05

also this one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudoku#Rules_and_terminology

o
Paralysed analyst

On a ship of fools

Joined
26 May 04
Moves
25780
28 Jun 05

Originally posted by sonhouse
well that blows my 3 and 4 thing. The puzzle I saw on the sudoku
site had 6 3's and 3 4's (30) It just seemed to allow more
solutions if you had less occupied squares.
So the key is the *position* in the squares.
They've just started doing these in my local newspaper. The ones I've seen have 3 or 4 entries in SOME subsquares, but definitely not every subsquare.