1. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    03 Jan '12 15:09
    Originally posted by tvochess
    And by the way: 0,99.. = 1
    Agree.
  2. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    12431
    04 Jan '12 13:18
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    How do you define a hypotenuse in terms of caaalcuuuluuuuussss?
    *Sigh*

    You don't. That's the ensanguined point.

    Richard
  3. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    04 Jan '12 17:13
    Originally posted by Shallow Blue
    *Sigh*

    You don't. That's the ensanguined point.

    Richard
    So you're basically telling us that you cannot use caaalcuuuluuuuussss in geometrical problems? Is that your Nobel Price worth genius conclusion?

    What's your problem?
  4. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    12431
    07 Jan '12 17:27
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    What's your problem?
    My problem is that you're pretending to be an idiot, and this is not behaviour I used to be used to from you.

    Have you joined the Witnesses in your absence, or what gives?

    Richard
  5. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    08 Jan '12 16:54
    Originally posted by Shallow Blue
    My problem is that you're pretending to be an idiot, and this is not behaviour I used to be used to from you.

    Have you joined the Witnesses in your absence, or what gives?

    Richard
    Calm down, don't go ape. Just answer my question and don't act as a JWer creationist. I know that you are more intelligent than that.
  6. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    12431
    08 Jan '12 21:06
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    Calm down, don't go ape. Just answer my question and don't act as a JWer creationist. I know that you are more intelligent than that.
    *PLONK*
  7. Shanghai
    Joined
    16 Feb '06
    Moves
    131087
    09 Jan '12 06:23
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    So you're basically telling us that you cannot use caaalcuuuluuuuussss in geometrical problems? Is that your Nobel Price worth genius conclusion?

    What's your problem?
    Just on a point of order there is no nobel prize for mathematics so it would have to be worth something else instead.
  8. Joined
    08 Apr '09
    Moves
    19506
    09 Jan '12 09:44
    That would be the Fields Medal then.
  9. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    09 Jan '12 22:45
    CALCUUUUULUUUUUUUUS!
  10. Joined
    04 Aug '09
    Moves
    1573
    10 Jan '12 16:461 edit
    K. So, I didn't actually see this answered, and I think I might know the simplest way to do it.

    You want to translate fractions to decimals, right? This requires division.

    Fraction: 1/9
    to translate, divide the numerator by the denominator. I'm going to do it the "long way", for the purpose of demonstration.

    9|1

    9 fits into 1 how many times? 0. so, since we all agree that 1.0 is the same thing as 1, that is what we will change it to.

    .1
    9|1.0
    -9
    1

    9 fits into 1.0 how many times? .1. however, this is not completely resolved as we still have leftover numbers. In other words, 1 is not EVENLY divisible 9. See, in this step, 9 will still have to fit into 10, because that is the number that is left. (everybody knows how long division works, right?)

    Now, certain fractions cannot be accurately translated into decimal form. A fraction is basically just a division problem no one bothered to work out. This is because the answer never stops. It goes on and on, forming a repeating decimal. For example: 1/9=0.11...
    This is the closest you can get to the fraction, because the repeating never stops.

    Now we will try the same way that we translated the last fraction, but this time using 9/9.

    9|9 9 fits into 9 how many times? 1. 1 time. therefore, the answer is 1
    because it is perfectly even and divisible.

    Although this doesn't make much sense, that is when you are using some odd form of algebra... It really doesn't work that way.

    Consider like this!

    1/9=0.11...
    9/9=1
    how?
    9/9 is 9 1/9. This means that 1/9+1/9+1/9+1/9+1/9+1/9+1/9+1/9+1/9=9/9.
    In order to prove that 9/9 is indeed 1, and not some other wacky number, we must say that the above equation is translatable into decimals, and does indeed equal 1.
    does 0.11...+0.11...+0.11...+0.11...+0.11...+0.11...+0.11...+0.11...+0.11...+=1?
    Yuppers. So, that means that 9/9 MUST DEFINITELY equal 1.
  11. Joined
    08 Dec '06
    Moves
    28383
    24 Feb '12 02:22
    Here are some proofs:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.999...

    Taxicab example:


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxicab_geometry
  12. Joined
    21 Jan '12
    Moves
    16991
    07 Mar '12 01:55
    How about searching on google?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree