Originally posted by XanthosNZ
This is the proof I've always thought of as the most clear.
And if the person you are talking to can't understand it then the only avenue left is to simulate it many many times and let them see what happens.
Here in the U.S., there is a weekly feature that appears in "Parade", a magazine that is included in our Sunday newspapers. The column is called "Ask Marilyn", and it is written by Marilyn vos Savant...the column (and her website) claim that she was listed in the Guinness Book of World Records as having the highest IQ ever, for both children and adult scores. Some controversy has arisen about that claim, but that's neither here nor there...
This very question appeared in her column several years ago, and she answered that "yes, you should switch.. " , and as an example, used a game show with a million doors (and one car), and after your guess, the host opens all the doors except # 777,777, and yours... then she concluded "you'd switch to door # 777,777 pretty quickly, wouldn't you?"
She also explained that there was a 2/3 chance of winning if you switched.
You should have seen the controversy that erupted after she wrote that answer... she had math teachers from all levels (including people who claimed to be professors at prestigious colleges) claiming that she didn't know what she was talking about, and that the answer should be 50/50 as to whether it pays to switch.
She then repeated her answer, this time showing a grid of each possible scenario, which clearly showed that if you switch, you win 2/3 of the time.
This convinced a number of people, but not everybody... after another 2 or 3 columns were devoted to this question, she suggested (as you did) that people actually perform the experiment and record the results.
A number of classrooms (at all levels) nationwide did in fact perform the experiment, and finally, most of the people who responded to her were indeed convinced that it does pay to switch your choice of doors, but admitted that they were astonished by the results of their experiment.
In one of the columns devoted to this question, she also pointed out that if, for example, a spaceship landed after the host opened the losing door, that the alien in the spaceship would, in fact, have a 50% chance of winning in this situation, because it would lack the knowledge the original contestant had (that the host opened a losing door on purpose).
I've tried this question on a number of people since that time, but it seems that no one I asked understands the answer until it's demonstrated as I did here (showing all possible scenarios).
A very interesting example of how people think about these things.
EDIT: I just checked, and here is a link to Marilyn's site which discusses this problem. Marilyn herself reprints the question, her response, and responses she printed from her readers.
http://www.marilynvossavant.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=64
The columns were originally published during 1990 and 1991.