Go back
Triangles in Triangles

Triangles in Triangles

Posers and Puzzles

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
01 Feb 20
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Begin with an equilateral triangle whose vertices are labeled "A,B,C" ( clockwise from bottom left)

Place another ( smaller ) equilateral triangle at "A" with vertices "A,D,E" such that "D" lies on line segment "BC", and line segment "DE" intersects line segment "AC" at "P".

What is angle "ACE"?


I'm getting hung up on this, not sure what obvious relationship I'm missing. Look forward to seeing the different proofs, and then discussing why my attempt fell short.

I was hoping to prove that angle DAC was equivalent to angle DEC, proving triangles ADP and EPC were similar? I fell short of finding enough independent equations to achieve this.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
01 Feb 20

@joe-shmo said
Begin with an equilateral triangle whose vertices are labeled "A,B,C" ( clockwise from bottom left)

Place another ( smaller ) equilateral triangle at "A" with vertices "A,D,E" such that "D" lies on line segment "BC", and line segment "DE" intersects line segment "AC" at "P".

What is angle "ACE"?


I'm getting hung up on this, not sure what obvious relationship I'm m ...[text shortened]... nd EPC were similar? I fell short of finding enough independent equations to achieve this. [/hidden]
It seems as though D could lie anywhere along BC

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
01 Feb 20
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@AThousandYoung
That is a correct observation.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
01 Feb 20
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@joe-shmo said
Begin with an equilateral triangle whose vertices are labeled "A,B,C" ( clockwise from bottom left)

Place another ( smaller ) equilateral triangle at "A" with vertices "A,D,E" such that "D" lies on line segment "BC", and line segment "DE" intersects line segment "AC" at "P".

What is angle "ACE"?


I'm getting hung up on this, not sure what obvious relationship I'm m ...[text shortened]... nd EPC were similar? I fell short of finding enough independent equations to achieve this. [/hidden]
Addendum:

Connect points "C" and "E" with a line segment to form angle "ACE".

f
Defend the Universe

127.0.0.1

Joined
18 Dec 03
Moves
16687
Clock
02 Feb 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

angle BAD = CAE
AB = AC, AD = AE
since we have side-angle-side the same:
ABD ~ ACE, so it's always 60*

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
02 Feb 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@forkedknight
That would be correct!

I was obviously blinded by poor geometry technique in the first place. Well done.

Follow up: Since your probably better at this, do you see a way to directly show that angle DAP = PEC? Proving triangles DAP and PEC are similar?

f
Defend the Universe

127.0.0.1

Joined
18 Dec 03
Moves
16687
Clock
02 Feb 20
2 edits

@joe-shmo said
@forkedknight
That would be correct!

I was obviously blinded by poor geometry technique in the first place. Well done.

Follow up: Since your probably better at this, do you see a way to directly show that angle DAP = PEC? Proving triangles DAP and PEC are similar?
Well, we know angle ADP = ACE = 60*
We know angle APD = EPC because they are opposing at P
180 - ADP - APD = 180 - ACE - EPC
therefore, angle DAP = PEC

Showing two angles the same is enough to know two triangles are similar

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
02 Feb 20
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@forkedknight

I think you might be misunderstanding me. The objective was to determine angle ACE, so initially we don't know angle ADP = EPC = 60.

It can be shown that triangle APE is similar to triangle PDC directly by equivalent angles. So, basically I'm asking the question: Is it possible to show ( or is it perhaps necessary ) that the remaining two triangles in the quadrilateral ADCE ( namely ADP and EPC ) are similar. Then somehow work out that angle DAP = PEC, thus proving by equivalence angles ADP = PCE = 60?

Your proof seems to be the best route, I'm just trying to gage how far away I was from actually finding a solution in the method outlined above (was it right around a corner or infinitely far away)

f
Defend the Universe

127.0.0.1

Joined
18 Dec 03
Moves
16687
Clock
02 Feb 20
4 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@joe-shmo

I see what you mean
By similarity, the ratio of lengths AP : DP = PE : PC
Therefore DP : PE = AP : PC
That's enough info to prove ADP ~ ECP

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
Clock
03 Feb 20
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@forkedknight said
@joe-shmo

I see what you mean
By similarity, the ratio of lengths AP : DP = PE : PC
Therefore DP : PE = AP : PC
That's enough info to prove ADP ~ ECP
I was trying to show similarity between triangles ADP and EPC using known similarity between triangles APE and DPC. So, DP/AP = CP/EP, and the similarity falls out algebraically through EP/AP=CP/DP and a common angle at "P" (Side-Side-Angle).

So something seems a little flipped from my notation as "By similarity, the ratio of lengths AP : DP = PE : PC" seems to show similarity between traingles ADP and EPC immediately, making your following statement "Therefore DP : PE = AP : PC" redundant? But yes, that seems to be what I was looking for. Thanks for your solutions!

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
03 Feb 20
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@forkedknight said
angle BAD = CAE
AB = AC, AD = AE
since we have side-angle-side the same:
ABD ~ ACE, so it's always 60*
How do you know <BAD=<CAE?

Never mind, I see now

<BAD+<DAC = <DAC+<CAE = 60
<BAD=<CAE = 60-<DAC

f
Defend the Universe

127.0.0.1

Joined
18 Dec 03
Moves
16687
Clock
03 Feb 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@joe-shmo said
So something seems a little flipped from my notation as "By similarity, the ratio of lengths AP : DP = PE : PC" seems to show similarity between traingles ADP and EPC immediately, making your following statement "Therefore DP : PE = AP : PC" redundant? But yes, that seems to be what I was looking for. Thanks for your solutions!
Yes, you are correct, the therefore is redundant.

I was trying to say that the ratios of the sides of triangles APE and DPC are same by similarity, and the ratios of the sides of triangles DAP and CPE are the same since they share two of the same sides, so therefore must also be similar.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
03 Feb 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@forkedknight said
Well, we know angle ADP = ACE = 60*
We know angle APD = EPC because they are opposing at P
180 - ADP - APD = 180 - ACE - EPC
therefore, angle DAP = PEC

Showing two angles the same is enough to know two triangles are similar
Nice

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.