1. Joined
    25 Nov '06
    Moves
    1434
    06 Dec '06 20:16
    Try these harder mates.
    1) White to move. +-
  2. Joined
    25 Nov '06
    Moves
    1434
    06 Dec '06 20:28
    2) Another puzzle- not hard but harder than my normal ones.
    White to play. +-
  3. Joined
    12 Mar '03
    Moves
    44411
    06 Dec '06 20:56
    Originally posted by Alethia
    Try these harder mates.
    1) White to move. +-
    [fen]r1bqr2k/pppp2pp/3b1p2/1nP1p1N1/2Q5/1PNBP3/PB1P1PPP/2KR3R w[/fen]
    This is basic material: Philidor's smothered mate.
  4. Joined
    25 Nov '06
    Moves
    1434
    06 Dec '06 21:011 edit
    Yes- anyone who doesn't know this, post and I'll PM you.
  5. Indiana
    Joined
    29 May '06
    Moves
    1694
    07 Dec '06 02:57
    Originally posted by Alethia
    2) Another puzzle- not hard but harder than my normal ones.
    White to play. +-
    [fen]rr5k/4qp1p/b1Pp2pP/pn1Qp1NP/Pp6/1PN1P3/3P2P1/1BKR1RB1 w[/fen]
    I believe the key move is 1. Rxf7!
    1. ... Qd8, Qe8, Qf8
    2. Rxh7#

    1. ... Qxf7
    2. Nxf7+ Kg8
    3. Nxd6+ Kh8 (otherwise 3. ... Kf8 4. Qf7#
    4. Qxe5+ Kg8
    5. Qg7#

    I know there is a few more variations but my attention span quickly diminished after working out the first couple.
  6. Joined
    25 Nov '06
    Moves
    1434
    07 Dec '06 19:34
    3) An improved old puzzle which is easy but satisfying.
    White to play. +-
  7. Joined
    30 Oct '04
    Moves
    7813
    07 Dec '06 20:20
    Originally posted by Alethia
    3) An improved old puzzle which is easy but satisfying.
    White to play. +-
    [fen]1bq2rk1/6p1/n3PpP1/1pp1p3/3P1P2/B1P5/P7/2KQR2R w[/fen]
    There are at least four ways to force mate. The shortest being 1.Qh5 and 2.Qh8#. I presume the original idea was to implement the sacrifice of the two rooks? Maybe, you should add a mating threat on Black's part, so no quiet moves are possible.
  8. Joined
    25 Nov '06
    Moves
    1434
    07 Dec '06 20:25
    Maybe- can't be bothered. Any way of solving my puzzle within reason is fine by me.
  9. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    07 Dec '06 22:21
    Originally posted by Alethia
    Maybe- can't be bothered. Any way of solving my puzzle within reason is fine by me.
    You're forgetting that you can't call your version an "improvement" if a more banal, mundane mate works.
  10. Joined
    25 Nov '06
    Moves
    1434
    08 Dec '06 17:51
    I really don't care. Really, I only make these becasue I am bored, not because they're right. Duh.
  11. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    08 Dec '06 18:13
    Originally posted by Alethia
    I really don't care. Really, I only make these becasue I am bored, not because they're right. Duh.
    I suggest less composing and more solving. It will pass the time just as well, and you can learn from the work of good composers, which will improve your own compositions.

    It's inconsiderate and rude to your potential solvers not to bother testing your compositions for correctness. Why should they care enough to spend their time solving if you don't care enough to make a puzzle with a good, sound solution?
  12. Joined
    25 Nov '06
    Moves
    1434
    09 Dec '06 20:02
    #
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree