Posers and Puzzles

Posers and Puzzles

  1. Joined
    29 Feb '04
    Moves
    22
    15 Mar '05 04:431 edit
    No, do not adjust your monitor.

  2. Joined
    29 Feb '04
    Moves
    22
    15 Mar '05 05:023 edits
    White to play and mate in 12.

  3. SubscriberBigDoggProblem
    Court Jester
    lacking discretion
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    124059
    15 Mar '05 07:51
    Originally posted by THUDandBLUNDER
    No, do not adjust your monitor.

    [fen]RnBqkBnR/PPppppPP/8/8/8/8/ppPPPPpp/rNbQKbNr w - - [/fen]
    It's a pity the position is illegal.
  4. Joined
    29 Feb '04
    Moves
    22
    15 Mar '05 10:46
    Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
    It's a pity the position is illegal.
    Yes, but it's only a puzzle.
  5. SubscriberAThousandYoung
    iViva la Hispanidad!
    tinyurl.com/y2c6j2t3
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    24791
    15 Mar '05 10:53
    Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
    It's a pity the position is illegal.
    How is it illegal? Neither King is in check and no Pawns are on their eighth ranks...what rule is it breaking?
  6. Joined
    29 Feb '04
    Moves
    22
    15 Mar '05 11:56
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    How is it illegal? Neither King is in check and no Pawns are on their eighth ranks...what rule is it breaking?
    And no pieces or pawns have been captured.
    So how did the pawns pass each other?
  7. Standard memberAlcra
    Lazy Sod
    Everywhere
    Joined
    12 Oct '04
    Moves
    8623
    15 Mar '05 12:01
    Originally posted by THUDandBLUNDER
    And no pieces or pawns have been captured.
    So how did the pawns pass each other?
    There is a difference (maybe just symantics?) in illegal and possible.
    ATY said the position is not illegal, you are saying it is just not possible.

    The question I have then, is: Is the position illegal, or just impossible (or both?)

  8. Joined
    29 Feb '04
    Moves
    22
    15 Mar '05 12:19
    Originally posted by Alcra
    There is a difference (maybe just symantics?) in illegal and possible.
    ATY said the position is not illegal, you are saying it is just not possible.

    The question I have then, is: Is the position illegal, or just impossible (or both?)

    I would say that a position is illegal if it cannot be arrived at by a series of legal moves.
  9. SubscriberAThousandYoung
    iViva la Hispanidad!
    tinyurl.com/y2c6j2t3
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    24791
    15 Mar '05 14:02
    I say impossible but legal.
  10. Joined
    29 Feb '04
    Moves
    22
    15 Mar '05 14:482 edits
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    I say impossible but legal.
    Somewhat predicably, USCF gives a less-than-useful definition:
    Illegal position - A position in which both Kings are in check or a number of factors are involved which make a position illegal.
    http://www.uschess.org/beginners/glossary.php

    But the definition is clear in the world of chess problems (which is what I posted).
    Legal position (n.): a position that can be reached from the initial array by a game consisting entirely of legal moves, however bizarre. Conventionally, any chess problem should have a legal position. Naturally then, an illegal position is a position that cannot be reached by a legal game. (Oxford Companion to Chess).

    See also Article 8 of FIDE Laws.
    http://www.chessvariants.com/fidelaws.html

  11. SubscriberBigDoggProblem
    Court Jester
    lacking discretion
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    124059
    15 Mar '05 16:341 edit
    Edit: THUDandBLUNDER beat me to it!
  12. SubscriberAThousandYoung
    iViva la Hispanidad!
    tinyurl.com/y2c6j2t3
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    24791
    15 Mar '05 18:31
    Originally posted by THUDandBLUNDER
    Somewhat predicably, USCF gives a less-than-useful definition:
    Illegal position - A position in which both Kings are in check or a number of factors are involved which make a position illegal.
    http://www.uschess.org/beginners/glossary.php

    But the definition is clear in the world of chess problems (which is what I posted).
    Legal position (n.): a ...[text shortened]... n to Chess).

    See also Article 8 of FIDE Laws.
    http://www.chessvariants.com/fidelaws.html

    All right then. I bow down to your superior researching efforts. It's illegal! Give yourself a ticket, THUDandBLUNDER!!
  13. Joined
    29 Feb '04
    Moves
    22
    15 Mar '05 19:091 edit
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    All right then. I bow down to your superior researching efforts. It's illegal! Give yourself a ticket, THUDandBLUNDER!!
    I don't think the definition matters too much.

  14. SubscriberBigDoggProblem
    Court Jester
    lacking discretion
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    124059
    15 Mar '05 21:21
    Originally posted by THUDandBLUNDER
    I don't think the definition matters too much.
    It does matter. As your source pointed out, most compositions begin from legal positions. Can you really claim you have given checkmate if the position was not legal to start with? In a game, the opponent may able to have the game replayed from the last legal position. An excellent defense against 'forced' mate!

    If legality is deliberately shirked, it makes the problem 'unorthodox' and more like a 'fairy' problem (even though I hate that term).
  15. Joined
    29 Feb '04
    Moves
    22
    16 Mar '05 07:01
    Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
    It does matter. As your source pointed out, most compositions begin from legal positions. Can you really claim you have given checkmate if the position was not legal to start with? In a game, the opponent may able to have the game replayed from the last legal position. An excellent defense against 'forced' mate!

    If legality is deliberately shirke ...[text shortened]... kes the problem 'unorthodox' and more like a 'fairy' problem (even though I hate that term).
    IMO, it matters for games.
    Less so for problems unless they are retros.
    In fact, I think I will post a few of my favourites.
Back to Top