18 Jul '08 07:22>
Originally posted by PinkFloydIt does apply to other senses. However it's important to remember that just because you didn't see or hear something that doesn't mean nothing happened. The branch breaking in the forest when transcribed to sight doesn't become "does the tree exist", it becomes "does what looks like a tree exist".
This question has always intrigued me. And I always find myself changing which side I'm on I do have a question though: Why doesn't the same theory apply to the other senses as well. If a star goes nova, we don't see the results until the light travels millions of light years to get to us, right? But none of us were around to see it, when it occurred ...[text shortened]... n't "disturbed until millions of years later, when there were optic nerves to witness it?