Cosmic rays cannot explain global warming

I don't believe this but now it seems that there wasn't any slowdown in the rate of recent warming after all! -it all comes down to missing data of the warming of the poles that have warmed much more than was assumed by the models:

http://phys.org/news/2013-11-discovery-prompts-global.html

If you see the video as well as read the link, there seems to be little doubt about it!

Originally posted by humy
I don't believe this but now it seems that there wasn't any slowdown in the rate of recent warming after all! -it all comes down to missing data of the warming of the poles that have warmed much more than was assumed by the models:

http://phys.org/news/2013-11-discovery-prompts-global.html

If you see the video as well as read the link, there seems to be little doubt about it!

You beat me to it🙂

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Carbon put into the atmosphere by animals (farts and breathing) is part
of the natural Carbon Cycle (the Carbon ultimately came from CO2 fixed
by plants). The net effect is zero (apart from the increased effect of CH4)

Burning fossil fuels puts [b]extra Carbon into the Carbon Cycle.

THAT IS THE PROBLEM![/b]

Not when a species is overpopulated.

Originally posted by MISTER CHESS
Not when a species is overpopulated.

It does not matter what the population size of the species involved.

The Carbon cycle is a closed loop apart from burning fossil fuels.

Where do you think cows get carbon from to make methane?