03 Nov '13 05:29>3 edits
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2013/05/20/finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-e-cat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-world-will-change-after-all/
If these figures hold up, it will be a game changer for sure. News at 11. I wrote to them and asked if I could make measurements, it is not rocket science to do so, just measure the voltage and current of the input power VS output heat in BTU.
I don't know why this took so long. We (humans) REALLY need this to be true.
Now there needs to be verification of the verification by yet another party. Some of the participants have been avid supporters of this cold fusion project so they might be tainted with seed money or something.
One thing I don't see in this report, how much energy was involved in the heaters, how many Kw or Kwhr's were going into the thing. That is the question I could have answered with just a couple of probes which took a LONG time to see the light of day.
Here is the real report: I see numbers of 360 watts as the seed energy and about 2000 watts of thermal energy production, if so, this is GREAT news.
There test ran for 96 hours. The caveat they told was not being able to get one before it was running and they were measuring a running device. They want to test one before it starts running to be sure of their values.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1305/1305.3913.pdf
If these figures hold up, it will be a game changer for sure. News at 11. I wrote to them and asked if I could make measurements, it is not rocket science to do so, just measure the voltage and current of the input power VS output heat in BTU.
I don't know why this took so long. We (humans) REALLY need this to be true.
Now there needs to be verification of the verification by yet another party. Some of the participants have been avid supporters of this cold fusion project so they might be tainted with seed money or something.
One thing I don't see in this report, how much energy was involved in the heaters, how many Kw or Kwhr's were going into the thing. That is the question I could have answered with just a couple of probes which took a LONG time to see the light of day.
Here is the real report: I see numbers of 360 watts as the seed energy and about 2000 watts of thermal energy production, if so, this is GREAT news.
There test ran for 96 hours. The caveat they told was not being able to get one before it was running and they were measuring a running device. They want to test one before it starts running to be sure of their values.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1305/1305.3913.pdf