Originally posted by Andrew Hamilton
I have just read the following from this weeks newScientist magazine issue No 2673 pages 30
“switching from the average American diet to a vegetarian one could cut emissions by 1.5 tonnes of CO2eq per person”
So if we all went vegi, not only would there be less methane release but also less CO2 release.
And, in addition, from page 31:
“ ...[text shortened]... meat is incredibly inefficient. Only 5 to 25 per cent of the nutrients are converted into meat.”
I assume that 1.5 tons of CO2/person is also per year, right?
I was thinking about CO2 from cars and just a quick analysis, ' a pint's a pound the world around' so a pint of fuel or one pound of fuel turns into about 3 pounds of CO2. So if you get 8 miles per gallon, that is one pint per mile, just for the sake of argument, then driving 20,000 miles in one year means you put out 3 pounds of CO2 per mile so 60,000 pounds per year or 30 tons. Now if we triple that gas mileage to 24 MPG then we are pumping out 10 tons/year into the air. 48 MPG means we would pump 5 tons per year. So it seems even if we are getting close to 50 MPG we would be still pumping over 3 times the amount we would save not eating meat so we can only effect 25 or 30% the amount going into the air by our diet.
We gain the most by going to more fuel efficient cars it looks like to me.
So by getting 50 MPG we would still be pumping 6.5 tons of CO2 per year per person, adding the two sources together.
It's interesting that we are that close even, I would have guessed our eating would be a lot less than that. 1.5 tons per year=0.5 tons of fuel in gasoline anyway but it is saying we would be eating about 1000 pounds of food per year, all things being equal. 3 pounds a day. Do we actually eat 3 pounds a day?