how big is universe ?

how big is universe ?

Science

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22069
09 Aug 22

@athousandyoung said
You’re wrong because there is no difference between us moving away from an object and an object moving away from us
LOL!
That is exactly what I said which is why I am right.
How can you tell the difference?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53264
09 Aug 22

@Metal-Brain
And why do you think that fundamentally matters? The main thing is the recession velocity, it matters little who is going away from whom.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22069
09 Aug 22

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
And why do you think that fundamentally matters? The main thing is the recession velocity, it matters little who is going away from whom.
It matters if you cannot distinguish the difference. Can you?

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12477
09 Aug 22

@metal-brain said
That is exactly what I said
No, it's not.

"Either the galaxy moving away from us or us moving away from the galaxy", which is essentially what you said, is a fundamentally un-relativistic statement. The reality is "Us and that galaxy having a relative movement".

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12477
09 Aug 22

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
And why do you think that fundamentally matters? The main thing is the recession velocity, it matters little who is going away from whom.
It matters a lot - because it's neither. It's relative movement, not one moving away from another.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22069
09 Aug 22

@shallow-blue said
It matters a lot - because it's neither. It's relative movement, not one moving away from another.
It is both. You just said so by saying it is relative movement.
You contradicted yourself.

Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
36841
09 Aug 22
1 edit

@metal-brain said
None of you can explain why I am wrong but you are the last word. Right.
Tell us again why you think time dilation is the result of gravity.
Simply tell us all why gravity would cause time dilation.
We are all waiting.
Strap this one on for size.

According to Einstein, there is no difference (at least you cannot tell from inside a spaceship) between sitting on a planet with 1x Earth gravity and traveling through space at a constant 1G acceleration. Either way, with sufficient speed OR gravity, you will experience time dilation. Since you can experience time dilation without gravity, therefore time dilation does not cause gravity. In fact, it is gravity (OR acceleration) which causes time dilation.

Savvy?

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22069
09 Aug 22
1 edit

@suzianne said
Strap this one on for size.

According to Einstein, there is no difference (at least you cannot tell from inside a spaceship) between sitting on a planet with 1x Earth gravity and traveling through space at a constant 1G acceleration. Either way, with sufficient speed OR gravity, you will experience time dilation. Since you can experience time dilation without gravity, t ...[text shortened]... s not cause gravity. In fact, it is gravity (OR acceleration) which causes time dilation.

Savvy?
" Since you can experience time dilation without gravity"

That proves nothing. I refer you to the equivalence principal.

" In fact, it is gravity (OR acceleration) which causes time dilation."

False. It is both.

This is the last time I will correct your nonsense.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22069
09 Aug 22

If we cannot see light from galaxies in the distant universe it does not prove the universe is expanding faster than light. It is possible there is no light there to see there, but let's assume there is light and it has not reached us because it is too far way. That would prove 2 things.

1. Our galaxy is not anywhere near the center of the universe.
2. The universe is expanding more than half of the speed of light

Think about it. It will come to you.

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12477
09 Aug 22

Mate, you're so far out of your depth, you're not even in the swimming pool any more.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22069
09 Aug 22

@shallow-blue said
Mate, you're so far out of your depth, you're not even in the swimming pool any more.
You don't know the difference between a radius and circumference, do you?

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12477
09 Aug 22

@metal-brain said
You don't know the difference between a radius and circumference, do you?
You don't know the difference between diameter and temperature, do you

Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
36841
09 Aug 22

@metal-brain said
" Since you can experience time dilation without gravity"

That proves nothing. I refer you to the equivalence principal.

" In fact, it is gravity (OR acceleration) which causes time dilation."

False. It is both.

This is the last time I will correct your nonsense.
It's like talking to a child.

No, worse. Children can be taught.

Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
36841
09 Aug 22
1 edit

@metal-brain said
You don't know the difference between a radius and circumference, do you?
2Pi R the difference.

Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
36841
09 Aug 22

@metal-brain said
If we cannot see light from galaxies in the distant universe it does not prove the universe is expanding faster than light. It is possible there is no light there to see there, but let's assume there is light and it has not reached us because it is too far way. That would prove 2 things.

1. Our galaxy is not anywhere near the center of the universe.
2. The universe is expanding more than half of the speed of light

Think about it. It will come to you.
Did you come up with this stuff on your own?



"Do you actually mean the entire heavens don't revolve around the earth?"