06 Jan '17 12:56>1 edit
Originally posted by twhiteheadThe advantage of gigahertz frequencies is they are more line of sight whereas say 50 mhz and below are more susceptible to atmospheric disturbances, Ionospheric defraction and so forth. At 5 ghz, those waves could care less about the ionosphere, but there are still semi-ionized blobs in the lower atmosphere that can reduce the intensity of the beams, I used to work on Space diversity microwave communications links and one of my jobs was to monitor the SNR of the signals, two dishes about 20 meters apart and the same on the other end, the SNR was up and down like a yo you but at different times even though the two dishes were only 20 meters apart. One SNR would be in the toilet but the other 60 db stronger but a few milliseconds later the opposite happened.
That's certainly a good idea, but I believe identifying the direction of non-line of sight radio waves is extremely difficult as they tend to reflect rather easily.
Here in Southern Africa, the most popular satellite TV comes from a couple of satellites. One could measure the angle of satellite dishes. I do know for a fact that dishes in Cape Town poin ...[text shortened]... e in Zambia, but that would be the case even on a flat earth as the satellites are to the north.
So a signal combiner allowed almost perfect communications for short links up to a couple hundred Km apart. Of course all that technology has been replaced by satellites now but it worked well for the time. There was an alternate means developed at the time, called frequency diversity instead of space diversity, where the radio had 17 channels of different frequencies and only one microwave dish, in fact, not even on a tower but on the ground, a lot more portable where the dish was made like slices of an orange skin and put together in the field and at the other end the same. They would talk to each other in millisecond segments of time, 'chan 1 is good, lets go to chan 1.
A few milliseconds later, the radio notices chan 1 is in the toilet, they scan continuously and they find, chan 14 is clear switch there, and so forth, all fast enough that 24 separate audio channels could be transmitted with no loss of data. But the kind of data you would be after would be done just integrating a large sample of signals to suss out the actual angles involved.
Getting back to the gyroscope technique, I wonder how long a rotor could keep up to speed if it was in a vacuum and supported by magnetic bearings instead of physical bearings? If it could maintain say 90% of it's spin velocity for 6 hours it would show a 90 degree shift and such with no need for extra motors and the power requirements for the same. I know they are researching vacuum magnetic bearings for power storage, get the rotor up to 100,000 RPM and it stores quite a bit of energy and of course a gyroscope wouldn't need that extreme RPM's to do the curveature experiment. What do you think?