1. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    19 May '15 10:07
    http://phys.org/news/2015-05-vortex-bladeless-aims-lower-cost-energy.html
  2. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    19 May '15 11:58
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    http://phys.org/news/2015-05-vortex-bladeless-aims-lower-cost-energy.html
    I think this would also remove the problem of wind farms screwing with our air traffic control
    and defence radar systems.
  3. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    19 May '15 12:121 edit
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    I think this would also remove the problem of wind farms screwing with our air traffic control
    and defence radar systems.
    And birds not wanting to nest or travel near the blades of a traditional windmill.

    The surprising thing I saw in the video was the small actual amount of movement of the vibrating element. A traditional blade is doing a pretty fast degree per second clip.
  4. Standard memberDeepThought
    Losing the Thread
    Cosmopolis
    Joined
    27 Oct '04
    Moves
    78625
    19 May '15 17:44
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    I think this would also remove the problem of wind farms screwing with our air traffic control
    and defence radar systems.
    Seriously?
  5. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    19 May '15 21:33
    Originally posted by DeepThought
    Seriously?
    Seriously.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/energy/windpower/10828204/7m-wind-turbines-at-standstill-over-radar-fears.html

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/48437/5675-wind-turbine-study-raytheon-report.pdf

    http://www.aveillant.com/applications/windfarm-mitigation/

    https://www.qinetiq.com/services-products/maritime/research-systems/Documents/VERIFEYE-Mitigating-the-effects-of-wind-farms-on-radar.pdf
  6. Standard memberDeepThought
    Losing the Thread
    Cosmopolis
    Joined
    27 Oct '04
    Moves
    78625
    20 May '15 00:06
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    Seriously.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/energy/windpower/10828204/7m-wind-turbines-at-standstill-over-radar-fears.html

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/48437/5675-wind-turbine-study-raytheon-report.pdf

    http://www.aveillant.com/applications/windfarm-mitigation/

    https://www.qinetiq.com/services- ...[text shortened]... s/maritime/research-systems/Documents/VERIFEYE-Mitigating-the-effects-of-wind-farms-on-radar.pdf
    Talk about the law of unintended consequences. Thanks for the links.
  7. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    20 May '15 00:49
    Originally posted by DeepThought
    Talk about the law of unintended consequences. Thanks for the links.
    No problem.
  8. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    20 May '15 12:54
    Originally posted by DeepThought
    Talk about the law of unintended consequences. Thanks for the links.
    The solution for the radar problem would be to stealth the turbine blades, like a rubberized RF absorbing layer, that would eliminate the blinking returns the airports are getting.
  9. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    20 May '15 14:38
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    The solution for the radar problem would be to stealth the turbine blades, like a rubberized RF absorbing layer, that would eliminate the blinking returns the airports are getting.
    Stealth coatings tend to be rather expensive and/or classified...

    At least ones that are light, hard-wearing, and thin enough to use on an aerodynamic surface.

    Might be better off just making the blades out of a radio transparent materiel that is still strong,
    light, and cheep enough.

    Although if this pans out, these blade-less generators look to be a better and cheaper alternative.
  10. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    20 May '15 15:08
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    Stealth coatings tend to be rather expensive and/or classified...

    At least ones that are light, hard-wearing, and thin enough to use on an aerodynamic surface.

    Might be better off just making the blades out of a radio transparent materiel that is still strong,
    light, and cheep enough.

    Although if this pans out, these blade-less generators look to be a better and cheaper alternative.
    I wonder if the new bladeless tech can be upgraded to industrial levels of power generation.
  11. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    20 May '15 15:20
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    I wonder if the new bladeless tech can be upgraded to industrial levels of power generation.
    I don't see any particular reason why not. It's what they said they were working on doing.

    The phenomena they are tapping into scales no problem.

    I don't see them running into an structural problems with modern lightweight composites.

    The only real question is whether their generator can cope with the much greater forces of a
    full scale [multi] megawatt generator reliably over the long term.

    I would assume the answer to that would be yes. We routinely make devices that take those
    kinds of loads, and this has very few moving parts to wear out.
  12. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    20 May '15 16:14
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    I don't see any particular reason why not. It's what they said they were working on doing.

    The phenomena they are tapping into scales no problem.

    I don't see them running into an structural problems with modern lightweight composites.

    The only real question is whether their generator can cope with the much greater forces of a
    full scale [multi ...[text shortened]... y make devices that take those
    kinds of loads, and this has very few moving parts to wear out.
    It seems clear there would be much less stress to local birds also.
  13. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    20 May '15 16:29
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    It seems clear there would be much less stress to local birds also.
    Indeed.

    The only downside thus far mentioned is individually the generators are less efficient
    than current turbines.

    However they are also much cheaper, and can be placed closer together.

    Meaning that the cost per GWhr should be lower, and the power per unit area should
    be higher for an array of these generators.
Back to Top