@shallow-blue saidhttps://www.graphene-info.com/graphene-oxide-gives-boost-new-intranasal-flu-vaccine
There is everything dishonest about your questions. All your questions.
You ask a question about "graphene", without acknowledging that there is no such thing as "graphene", simple. There are graphenes, many of them, with different properties.
You ask whether "it" (which doesn't exist as a single substance) is poisonous, without acknowledging that a s ...[text shortened]... is honest.
And now you will reply by repeating those two questions. Because, of course you will.
@Metal-Brain
Well having personally done spectrogram analysis on thousands of vaccine samples, I can say, maybe but so what?
@sonhouse saidIs it considered a poison? Yes or no?
@Metal-Brain
Well having personally done spectrogram analysis on thousands of vaccine samples, I can say, maybe but so what?
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
@metal-brain saidNo, you are doing exactly what I said you were going to do. You are raking "there mag be sone king of graphene in some vaccines" and twisting it into "all vaccines are full of graphene, all of which has the same properties"; and now you are going to twist "some variety of graphene may be poisonous" into "all graphene is absolute cancer". And then you're going to combine those into "vaccines are a plot to kill us all".
Is it considered a poison? Yes or no?
You do not debate honestly. You intentionally take nuanced matters and turn them into absolutes. There's no way to have a serious discussion with you - your every question is a leading one.
There is no correct answer to your questions, because they have been written not to. I'm not even going to try. You're not worth it.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
@sonhouse saidOnly better spelled, I hope. I can only blame my phobile keyboard and the bad light.
@Shallow-Blue
What he said.....
1 edit
@shallow-blue said"and twisting it into all vaccines are full of graphene"
No, you are doing exactly what I said you were going to do. You are raking "there mag be sone king of graphene in some vaccines" and twisting it into "all vaccines are full of graphene, all of which has the same properties"; and now you are going to twist "some variety of graphene may be poisonous" into "all graphene is absolute cancer". And then you're going to combine ...[text shortened]... ur questions, because they have been written not to. I'm not even going to try. You're not worth it.
I never said that, but why is it in any vaccine? Why do adjuvants have to be poisonous to the body? Poison being in vaccines is nothing new. Formaldehyde is in some vaccines and that is a known poison. The vaccine cultists argue that the human body produces formaldehyde naturally to defend it, but the human body does not produce graphene naturally.
Why are you an apologist for poison in vaccines?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32531395/
@sonhouse saidHe is defending poison in vaccines. Is that your position as well?
@Shallow-Blue
What he said.....
Is pointing out poison being put in vaccines something that should be censored? Is that dangerous misinformation even if it is true?
How can the truth be misinformation? Is the truth dangerous? Are some lies nobel because it is for your own good?