Go back
physics break-through?

physics break-through?

Science

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669895
Clock
25 Nov 19

https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-claim-a-they-ve-found-even-more-evidence-of-a-new-force-of-nature

I am a bit astonished this has not been brougt here.

It seems thatHungarian Professor Krasznahorkay and his Group have performed Experiments that lead to the conclusion that there is a new bososn with mass 17 eV and a hitherto unknown force carried by that new particle.
As of now the article is in peer-review, but preliminary results have been published already.

I for one am excited a bit.

D
Losing the Thread

Quarantined World

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
87415
Clock
25 Nov 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@ponderable said
https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-claim-a-they-ve-found-even-more-evidence-of-a-new-force-of-nature

I am a bit astonished this has not been brougt here.

It seems thatHungarian Professor Krasznahorkay and his Group have performed Experiments that lead to the conclusion that there is a new bososn with mass 17 eV and a hitherto unknown force carried by that new pa ...[text shortened]... in peer-review, but preliminary results have been published already.

I for one am excited a bit.
Forgive my skepticism, but if there's a fundamental boson with a mass of 17 MeV, and it couples strongly enough to influence the cross-section of beryllium 8 decay, why hasn't it been noticed in accelerator surveys. The mass is small enough that one would expect to be able to detect it with pretty basic equipment.

I'll have a read of the pre-print at some point in the next week and make a less knee-jerky comment then. Their paper is available at:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10459

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669895
Clock
25 Nov 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@deepthought said
Forgive my skepticism, but if there's a fundamental boson with a mass of 17 MeV, and it couples strongly enough to influence the cross-section of beryllium 8 decay, why hasn't it been noticed in accelerator surveys. The mass is small enough that one would expect to be able to detect it with pretty basic equipment.

I'll have a read of the pre-print at some point in the ...[text shortened]... ke a less knee-jerky comment then. Their paper is available at:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10459
Thank you for the link (didn't find that one)

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
11 Dec 19

@Ponderable
The word on the street is they made some kind of error. The argument goes, the actual MEV readout is low enough for even college accelerators to have seen and it has not been seen by anyone but them.
Which doesn't mean they are mistaken, the readings may have just been missed by everyone. News at 11......

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37387
Clock
03 Jan 20

@sonhouse said
@Ponderable
The word on the street is they made some kind of error. The argument goes, the actual MEV readout is low enough for even college accelerators to have seen and it has not been seen by anyone but them.
Which doesn't mean they are mistaken, the readings may have just been missed by everyone. News at 11......
Hmmmmm, shades of "cold fusion"?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
03 Jan 20

@Suzianne
News at 11....

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.