Go back
Possible treatment of Alzheimers:

Possible treatment of Alzheimers:

Science

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
25 Jan 20

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-01-lithium-halt-alzheimer-disease.html

micro doses of lithium. We'll see. My brother in law has 2nd stage Alzheimers and we are looking for anything that can help.
A sad end for my brother in law, a retired colonel.

h

Joined
06 Mar 12
Moves
642
Clock
25 Jan 20
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Who gave a thumbs down for this sonhouse's OP and, MUCH more importantly, why?
What could anyone possibly see as wrong with this OP? I simply cannot imagine.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
25 Jan 20
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@humy
Some assswipe who doesn't like me, probably Moot the hoot.

Just got word my brother in law got worse, stopped breathing and they sent him full time to rehab home. I also found out what may have driven him over the edge, his ex wife committed suicide new years day. Jesus what a goat fuk.

bunnyknight
bunny knight

planet Earth

Joined
12 Dec 13
Moves
2917
Clock
26 Jan 20
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Alzheimers, as well as cancer and diabetes is big business, making lots of money for a certain few, so I wouldn't get my hopes up. I've seen this story repeat time after time.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
26 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@bunnyknight
One study seems to point to a gum disease finding its way into the brain they say may be one cause of Alzheimers. Apparently the tangles of the amyloids were treated to reduce them with no effect on the progression of the disease. So those tangles and such seem to be an effect not a cause.

bunnyknight
bunny knight

planet Earth

Joined
12 Dec 13
Moves
2917
Clock
26 Jan 20
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse
If a safe and affordable cure were to truly be found, the biggest challenge would be to get it past the iron fist of the FDA, which has a conflict of interest with big pharma, and is a total monopoly.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
26 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@bunnyknight
The present treatments are extremely expensive and I suppose there could be some political pressure to not allow a cheap and effective treatment to be established but I think that would not work for long. Especially if we get a real person as POTUS next year.

bunnyknight
bunny knight

planet Earth

Joined
12 Dec 13
Moves
2917
Clock
26 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
@bunnyknight
The present treatments are extremely expensive and I suppose there could be some political pressure to not allow a cheap and effective treatment to be established but I think that would not work for long. Especially if we get a real person as POTUS next year.
Every treatment is as expensive as they can possibly get away with; it's the nature and law of corporate business-for-profit. And what's worse, they are all defined as "treatments" not "cures", which is a legal loophole to avoid lawsuits. Under the present system the perfect patient is one that's permanently sick, requiring endless, expensive treatment. It would take far more than a good POTUS to remedy the nightmare situation that's taken hold.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
27 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@bunnyknight
Yes but a bad one can cause big pharm to realize they won't have push back when they quadruple the price of a med and therefore the new price sticks.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
21 Feb 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@bunnyknight said
Every treatment is as expensive as they can possibly get away with; it's the nature and law of corporate business-for-profit. And what's worse, they are all defined as "treatments" not "cures", which is a legal loophole to avoid lawsuits. Under the present system the perfect patient is one that's permanently sick, requiring endless, expensive treatment. It would take far more than a good POTUS to remedy the nightmare situation that's taken hold.
Also, pharmaceutical companies argue that they spend a lot in research to justify the expense, but in reality they have gutted their R&D and mostly rely on government-funded basic science to generate drug compounds. Then they buy the patent and charge $10k/month for the treatment. I think gov'ts should be able to recoup their investment from pharma and use this to bring down costs.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
21 Feb 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@wildgrass
At the very least.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.