27 Mar '14 06:56>1 edit
Artists' renderings of wormholes show two (very large) 3-D spaces, with bright event horizons, connected by a tube. Like this:
https://www.google.com/search?q=wormhole+graphic&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari#biv=i%7C1%3Bd%7CDPIKU8iaoxBsKM%3A
But, isn't that wrong? The singularity is at the geographic center of the "tube" - which actually isn't a tube at all. The black hole is acting more or less equally (disregarding quantum effects) on spacetime and matter in each radial direction in a sphere - right? So, wouldn't we actually see an event horizon and a swirl no matter where we looked? There is no tube, or perhaps even more accurately, there are an infinite number of straight tubes radiating in every possible direction from the singularity. Right?
(Forget about traveling through wormholes. The singularity's gravity went to all the trouble to capture you, it's not letting you go. It's a one-way trip.).
How I do love 3 AM...
https://www.google.com/search?q=wormhole+graphic&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari#biv=i%7C1%3Bd%7CDPIKU8iaoxBsKM%3A
But, isn't that wrong? The singularity is at the geographic center of the "tube" - which actually isn't a tube at all. The black hole is acting more or less equally (disregarding quantum effects) on spacetime and matter in each radial direction in a sphere - right? So, wouldn't we actually see an event horizon and a swirl no matter where we looked? There is no tube, or perhaps even more accurately, there are an infinite number of straight tubes radiating in every possible direction from the singularity. Right?
(Forget about traveling through wormholes. The singularity's gravity went to all the trouble to capture you, it's not letting you go. It's a one-way trip.).
How I do love 3 AM...