Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Science Forum
tinyurl.com/43m7k8bw
Joined 23 Aug '04 Moves 26660
Ceres
Joined 14 Oct '06 Moves 18375 Originally posted by AThousandYoung
π πππ΄
silicon valley
Joined 27 Oct '04 Moves 101289 is (intraspecies) animal rape less immoral then people rape?
like, animal consumption is considered less immoral than consumption of people. so how about rape?
tinyurl.com/43m7k8bw
Joined 23 Aug '04 Moves 26660 Originally posted by zeeblebot
is (intraspecies) animal rape less immoral then people rape?
like, animal consumption is considered less immoral than consumption of people. so how about rape? Do you think we should vote that animal rape is less immoral that people rape? Or should we make it more immoral?
Or, as the title says, should we declare baby rape to be a virtuous act?
silicon valley
Joined 27 Oct '04 Moves 101289 intraspecies => between the animals. i don't think voting on it will make a difference. the animals won't know the result of our vote.
part of immorality is the element of disgust. even if you say the animal (or the baby) wasn't hurt and won't remember it and might have liked it, it's still statutory rape. the proportion of immorality obtained from disgust and the proportion obtained from survival goals is subjective.
Spiel des Lebens
Joined 27 Jan '05 Moves 90892 Originally posted by AThousandYoung
π If you have a compelling argument in favour of such a position, by all means share it.
silicon valley
Joined 27 Oct '04 Moves 101289 Originally posted by AThousandYoung
π i'm guessing that if you pose this question to your students you'll suddenly find yourself with a lot more time on your hands.
Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More . I Agree