1. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    27 Jun '15 14:47
    http://phys.org/news/2015-06-universe-crystal-glass.html

    So far they have detected 7 'rings' in the 13.7 billion years the universe has been around. So a frequency of 2 billion odd years per oscillation but variable.
  2. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    28 Jun '15 09:10
    From the article:
    "A new form of matter, dark energy, repulsive in nature, ...."
    Although I guess we can call photons 'matter', it gets a little confusing when you have 'dark matter' and 'dark energy' and then call the 'dark energy' a form of matter.

    My understanding is that if they are correct about the universe ringing, then it might remove the need for dark energy, and would also have implications for the long term future of the universe (big crunch rather than continuous expansion).
  3. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    28 Jun '15 21:56
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    From the article:
    "A new form of matter, dark energy, repulsive in nature, ...."
    Although I guess we can call photons 'matter', it gets a little confusing when you have 'dark matter' and 'dark energy' and then call the 'dark energy' a form of matter.

    My understanding is that if they are correct about the universe ringing, then it might remove the nee ...[text shortened]... ications for the long term future of the universe (big crunch rather than continuous expansion).
    We will all know within a couple billion years🙂
  4. Subscriberlemondrop
    balls of fire
    Joined
    19 Jul '13
    Moves
    181073
    29 Jun '15 21:37
    does it have anything to do with vibrating strings?
  5. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    30 Jun '15 07:131 edit
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    We will all know within a couple billion years🙂
    We should know before that. We should be able to see density waves in the large structure of the universe.
  6. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    30 Jun '15 13:56
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    We should know before that. We should be able to see density waves in the large structure of the universe.
    Yeah, that might be obvious in a mere one million years, eh.
  7. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    30 Jun '15 15:06
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Yeah, that might be obvious in a mere one million years, eh.
    No, it should be obvious in the next 10 years or so as we continue to map the universe.
  8. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    30 Jun '15 16:08
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    No, it should be obvious in the next 10 years or so as we continue to map the universe.
    You are talking about the continued improvements in the mapping of the cosmic background?
  9. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    30 Jun '15 20:362 edits
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    You are talking about the continued improvements in the mapping of the cosmic background?
    No. Improvements in the mapping of the locations of galaxies. Distance is determined at least in part by redshift which is a function of expansion. If the expansion is not uniform, but galaxy distribution is, then the map we get based on the assumption of uniform expansion will show density waves in the galaxy distributions.

    We should also find discrepancies between redshift distance and other methods of measuring distance.
  10. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    02 Jul '15 20:24
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    My understanding is that if they are correct about the universe ringing, then it might remove the need for dark energy, and would also have implications for the long term future of the universe (big crunch rather than continuous expansion).
    Your hypothesis supports my ideas about dark energy and the fate of the universe. :-)
  11. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    06 Jul '15 17:59
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    Your hypothesis supports my ideas about dark energy and the fate of the universe. :-)
    Like this theory, or proposition: The big rip.

    http://phys.org/news/2015-06-cosmic-stickiness-favors-big-rip.html
  12. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    06 Jul '15 18:10
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Like this theory, or proposition: The big rip.

    http://phys.org/news/2015-06-cosmic-stickiness-favors-big-rip.html
    Well, I'm not so sure about that... :/
  13. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    14 Jul '15 13:41
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    Well, I'm not so sure about that... :/
    That would kind of suck wouldn't it!
  14. Standard memberSoothfast
    0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,
    Planet Rain
    Joined
    04 Mar '04
    Moves
    2441
    18 Jul '15 21:11
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    From the article:
    "A new form of matter, dark energy, repulsive in nature, ...."
    Although I guess we can call photons 'matter', it gets a little confusing when you have 'dark matter' and 'dark energy' and then call the 'dark energy' a form of matter.

    My understanding is that if they are correct about the universe ringing, then it might remove the nee ...[text shortened]... ications for the long term future of the universe (big crunch rather than continuous expansion).
    I think physicists are just running out of ideas.
  15. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    19 Jul '15 01:06
    Originally posted by Soothfast
    I think physicists are just running out of ideas.
    They always have ideas, you can count on that. Proving them is another thing entirely.
Back to Top