Thanks for thoughtful inputs, that help produce further the following;
I am still working on my thinking about thoughts, hence the openness of my question..
> Thoughts are a probably holistic outcome of the energetic performance, transmission etc of millions of neurons working together. Even one neuron requires numerous inputs usually before firing off to other neurons. But I don't think the activity of the neurons can be equivalent to a thought, which is a far less physical thing, and also depends on an inner awareness to assess concepts arising. Does this inner awareness watching our own thinking, require energy? Is it another set of neuronic interactions assessing?
Something doesn't make sense - there appears a hiatus.
> If we go with the neuronic interactions as the only source of energy, are they then responsible also for such important aspects of achieving this wall, such as intention, persistence, future projection, moods such as discouragement at the walls collapse, etc. It appears very machine like to see all that energy as neuronic only. Our living experience of such is different. It is dynamic, flowing, adaptable and sometimes quite subtle and creative. Do mass cellular neurones possess creativity?
> If we go with the thinking that thoughts have no energy at all, there appears this hiatius between the neuronic activity and the external actions that produce the wall, which we know require effective thinking, planning, decision-making.
Are thoughts something like a "cloud" that arises from the energy and holistic activity of the neurones? I am beginning to think that thoughts themselves do not have energy themselves, but it is not just the neuronic activity that produces the wall.
Is thought perhaps a sort of "catalyst" for the production, transference or alteration of energies outside of itself. The concept of enzymes and catalysts come to mind as possible conceptual analogies.