https://phys.org/news/2019-05-energy-free-superfast-scientists-pulses.html
I'm not sure where the digital logic part comes in. Making 1's and 0'
s I guess but how is this going to be making logic, And gates, Or gates, Nor, Nand, XOR and the like, flip flops and such?
Is there anything actually here in this report?
I think you misunderstand; They aren't talking about information processing but rather information storage and retrieval i.e. they are talking about computer memory. That said, your misunderstanding is understandable because the "Energy-free superfast computing" part of the title of that article is not only highly misleading (because it makes it sound like they are talking about information PROCESSING) but also the "Energy-free" part is just nonsense (That should have been "Energy efficient" because energy still used). Its the editors fault that it was made misleading.
@humy saidYeah, I saw the recording effect but they didn't mention how they would readout such data and it was confusing to see computing in the title. A hard drive doesn't compute worth a shtye😉
I think you misunderstand; They aren't talking about information processing but rather information storage and retrieval i.e. they are talking about computer memory. That said, your misunderstanding is understandable because the "Energy-free superfast computing" part of the title of that article is not only highly misleading (because it makes it sound like they are talking about ...[text shortened]... en "Energy efficient" because energy still used). Its the editors fault that it was made misleading.
entropysail
You appear here and in other threads to be making completely random gibberish statements with no relevance to any current science topic at hand. Certainly you shouldn't be posting such things in a science forum!
Sadly, I don't see any "Completely random gibberish forum" to redirect your posts to so I guess the Spirituality forum will just have to do; -close enough!
@humy
Thank you for describing me by what I am not. Does science have such a keystone or is it just a language?
@entropysail saidInstead of posting your nonsense here, why don't you try researching what you ask? My guess is you know exactly what you are doing, that is, trolling and are not at all interested in science, you already said that. Keeping up with nonsense will get you banned.
@humy
Thank you for describing me by what I am not. Does science have such a keystone or is it just a language?
@Ponderable
I'm the one getting trolled for mentioning alternatives to circular descriptions other than the much berated pseudo-science. Surprised at Sonhouse, seems such a nice guy.
@entropysail saidIf there was some point to your posts that would be one thing. What is clear is you are just throwing out random BS. That is called trolling. Anyone can do that.
@Ponderable
I'm the one getting trolled for mentioning alternatives to circular descriptions other than the much berated pseudo-science. Surprised at Sonhouse, seems such a nice guy.
Like, what would happen if a millipede lost a leg and then had to climb a glacier.
Or If a tree falls in the forest would a magnetometer read a change in Siberia.
Etc., Etc., Etc.
@entropysail saidThe whole point is those sentences are pure nonsense just like your posts.
@sonhouse
Millipegonomy and Sub-Siberian Magnetology. I fail to see how that helps?