You have heard of the old 'hen and egg' argument. Now comes an expert in embryology who says the woman came before man according to human embryology. Anyone studying embryology or doing research in embryology? Methinks, this contradicts genetics which says the man has the 'xy' gene and the woman possesses the 'yy' gene. Since, then, the woman does not possess the 'x' gene, then man came first. Anyone?
According to the Bible, the chicken came before the egg:
Genesis 1:20-23 And God said, "Let the waters bring forth swarms of living creatures, and let BIRDS fly above the earth across the dome of the sky." So God created the great sea monsters and every living creature that moves, of every kind, with which the waters swarm, and every winged bird of every kind. And God saw that it was good. God blessed them, saying, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds MULTIPLY on the earth." And there was evening and there was morning, the fifth day.
And yea, the X came before the Y.... the rib-thing, remember?
kind regards,
the village atheist
Originally posted by pulernGlad you clarified that at the end.
According to the Bible, the chicken came before the egg:
Genesis 1:20-23 And God said, "Let the waters bring forth swarms of living creatures, and let BIRDS fly above the earth across the dome of the sky." So God created the great sea monsters and every living creature that moves, of every kind, with which the waters swarm, and every winged bird of every k ...[text shortened]... he X came before the Y.... the rib-thing, remember?
kind regards,
the village atheist
Originally posted by biligesleageIf I were to say, speaking in a spiritual point of view, that we, male or female, have ever been, being Life is just that, LIFE, would that be a bit too open minded a thought to swallow?
You have heard of the old 'hen and egg' argument. Now comes an expert in embryology who says the woman came before man according to human embryology. Anyone studying embryology or doing research in embryology? Methinks, this contradicts genetics which says the man has the 'xy' gene and the woman possesses the 'yy' gene. Since, then, the woman does not possess the 'x' gene, then man came first. Anyone?
Life never had a beginning, nor could it ever end. However, where one is in thought to WHAT Life is measures where one would be after what is called being deceased from this temporal state of being...
Originally posted by tacoandlettuceThere's a Spirituality forum where there is plenty of room for such open-minded ideas.
If I were to say, speaking in a spiritual point of view, that we, male or female, have ever been, being Life is just that, LIFE, would that be a bit too open minded a thought to swallow?
Life never had a beginning, nor could it ever end. However, where one is in thought to WHAT Life is measures where one would be after what is called being deceased from this temporal state of being...