With the advent of IEEE 802.11 network Wi-Fi standards, upgraded chipset manufacturing, new routing techniques, multiple user - signal designs, better amplitude transmitted to, diverse range and devices received from access points, and improvements in the data rate per nanosecond, how will (un)equal modulation and coding schemes become processed across digital subcarriers?
What are the prospects for licensing radio frequencies on a band whence antennas can increasingly mitigate traffic interference?
Streaming has to go thru space after all, plexed or beamform.
Quality of service is in the buffering, the path media takes, and ultimately in correspondence.
@Of-Ants-and-Imps saidOne of the big limitations of wireless throughput has been half duplex operation, which is to say like a walkie-talkie: one side speaks and the other side listens. The great advantage of cable, both copper wire and glass fiber optics, has been operatability in full duplex mode, send and receive simultaneously. Until the duplex issue has been resolved in wireless communication, all the improvements will keep hitting a brick wall.
With the advent of IEEE 802.11 network Wi-Fi standards, upgraded chipset manufacturing, new routing techniques, multiple user - signal designs, better amplitude transmitted to, diverse range and devices received from access points, and improvements in the data rate per nanosecond, how will (un)equal modulation and coding schemes become processed across digital subcar ...[text shortened]... .
Quality of service is in the buffering, the path media takes, and ultimately in correspondence.
https://www.prescouter.com/2020/04/full-duplex-wireless-systems-the-technology-paving-the-way-for-faster-5g-deployment/
Websites could answer oversimply perhaps, less cord is more green. You might have it hooked up to solar power or similar energy. One advantage to that `illusion of choice` lies on its intermittent capabilities.
Security of the data transferred with the latest WPA detail resolves much of the problem for its reauthentication part. Suspicious and unnecessary net traffic across mobile clients is no less able to be detected then. The radio wave spectrum sort-of acts like a hurdle to cyber attackers. Much harder to hit a roaming target. Full duplex connections are susceptible to aggravated Denial of Service. There's simplicity to Android and condensed systems op, less services running, keeps it smooth. The speed or latency due to packets retransmitted feels almost second-hand story.
You hear about 5th generation, which doesn't mean the 5 GHz bands. I guess the interest builds towards load-balancing and automated controllers but comes with other concerns. They have airtime fairness delegating the station data transmission. Signal to noise ratio issues. I'm reading a Sybex book capacity vs. coverage section.
I remember people had safety concerns... how it affects or interferes among other finely tuned instruments or devices. Anyways, why do desktop adaptive systems have airplane mode besides they anticipate software onsetting greater wireless function?
@Of-Ants-and-Imps saidAntennas can mitigate bandwidth alright but only up to a point. You are not going to get say more than 10 signal paths side by sides with separate UHF antennas.
With the advent of IEEE 802.11 network Wi-Fi standards, upgraded chipset manufacturing, new routing techniques, multiple user - signal designs, better amplitude transmitted to, diverse range and devices received from access points, and improvements in the data rate per nanosecond, how will (un)equal modulation and coding schemes become processed across digital subcar ...[text shortened]... .
Quality of service is in the buffering, the path media takes, and ultimately in correspondence.
The nice thing about those antennas which might have a wavelength of a few centimeters, they are nice and small and lend well to large numbers.
But no matter how much data pours down a single antenna you can still use multiple antennas to get even better response.
So 300 Mhz is one meter wavelength, 100CM wave. 3000 Mhz, 10 CM wave, 30,000 Mhz or 30 Ghz, wavelength 1 CM, 300 Ghz, 1 millimeter wavelength.
So higher frequency, the smaller the antenna can be for the same DB gain.
It is a matter of packing square wavelengths into a pan so if you have a 1MM wavelength, a 10MM dish will focus about 78 of those wavelengths so will give a pretty decent gain, but the lower the frequency you need bigger and bigger dishes to pick up those low UHF frequencies. So you have these thousand foot Radio Telescopes and 300 foot steerable dishes, really huge DB gains.