1. SubscriberKewpie
    since 1-Feb-07
    Joined
    20 Jan '09
    Moves
    318038
    03 Mar '14 09:15
    For friendly games, only. This is allowed on a Scrabble site I play on, opponents agree to place the game in "adjourned" status for a nominated number of days. Would have to be available to both subs and nonsubs to work properly. Both time-per-move and timebank-balance would stand still until the end of the period.

    Useful where one or the other has real-life hassles or a short-term technology problem.

    Can anyone see a problem with this?
  2. SubscriberPonderable
    chemist
    Linkenheim
    Joined
    22 Apr '05
    Moves
    518235
    03 Mar '14 09:30
    Originally posted by Kewpie
    For friendly games, only. This is allowed on a Scrabble site I play on, opponents agree to place the game in "adjourned" status for a nominated number of days. Would have to be available to both subs and nonsubs to work properly. Both time-per-move and timebank-balance would stand still until the end of the period.

    Useful where one or the other has real-life hassles or a short-term technology problem.

    Can anyone see a problem with this?
    A good idea on the one hand.

    On the other hand you can just agree on not taking the skull and in friendly games, this should work.