Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Site Ideas Forum

Site Ideas Forum

  1. 28 Jul '11 20:13
    Why is the RHP [hidden] command, notionally for hiding answers to puzzles. so hopeless.

    It will not reveal text with apostrophe
    '
    s in

    [hidden] Text with hard line returns
    in will never be hidden[/hidden]
  2. Standard member HandyAndy
    Non sum qualis eram
    28 Jul '11 20:46
    Originally posted by iamatiger
    Why is the RHP [hidden] command, notionally for hiding answers to puzzles. so hopeless.

    It will not reveal text with apostrophe[hidden]'[/hidden]s in

    [hidden] Text with hard line returns
    in will never be hidden[/hidden]
    It can be read when you click on Reply & Quote.

    Here's an example.
  3. 29 Jul '11 01:38
    Originally posted by iamatiger
    Why is the RHP [hidden] command, notionally for hiding answers to puzzles. so hopeless.

    It will not reveal text with apostrophe[hidden]'[/hidden]s in

    [hidden] Text with hard line returns
    in will never be hidden[/hidden]
    Sometimes it will

    Itapostrophes working this time


  4. Standard member Daemon Sin
    I'm A Mighty Pirateā„¢
    29 Jul '11 08:39
    Originally posted by iamatiger
    Why is the RHP [hidden] command, notionally for hiding answers to puzzles. so hopeless.

    It will not reveal text with apostrophe[hidden]'[/hidden]s in

    [hidden] Text with hard line returns
    in will never be hidden[/hidden]
    "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one\'s ignorance."<br /> - Confucius
  5. 29 Jul '11 13:06
    Originally posted by iamatiger
    Why is the RHP [hidden] command, notionally for hiding answers to puzzles. so hopeless.
    Possibly because it is merely mildly useful, and far from important. In other words, improving the chess playing functions of this site are possibly considered more important, by Russ & al., than fixing naggling bugs in some secondary function. Some might say that they're right.

    Richard
  6. Standard member HandyAndy
    Non sum qualis eram
    29 Jul '11 15:04
    Originally posted by Shallow Blue
    Possibly because it is merely mildly useful, and far from important. In other words, improving the chess playing functions of this site are possibly considered more important, by Russ & al., than fixing naggling bugs in some secondary function. Some might say that they're right.

    Richard
    They're right.
  7. 30 Jul '11 06:43 / 3 edits
    Originally posted by Daemon Sin
    [hidden]"Real knowledge is to know the extent of one\'s ignorance."<br /> - Confucius[/hidden]
    Woah, nice workaround!

    I knew you could not use tags inside posts! <br /><a href="http://www.google.com">Link to Google</a>


    But I had no idea you could use tags inside hidden! <br /><a href="http://www.google.com">Link to Google</a>