05 May '08 22:00>1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauderI like the fact that you're thinking about improving the scoring system.
Those "sports" (chess isn't a sport) don't consist of discrete, separate games.
Moreover, the meaninglessness of many of the games results in resignations that impair the primary purpose of the site i.e. to play chess. I've had players resign games with me because their clan have already mathematically clinched a win in the clan match. ey haven't really earned. And it is detrimental to the whole concept of clan competition.
But to me a clan is a team.. (like football, sorry for the comparison)
And teams win, lose or draw.. regardless of the exact score (ie. 10-0 is a win and 6-5 is a win)..
The amount of people competing in that challenge is also rewarded as it's theoretically a better achievement to win a 10 man challenge, rather than a 2 man challenge..
It does not make some games irrelavant as the total balance of the clan challenge matters.. so every game counts.. and yes, when it's 10-0 and 2 games are left in progress, they don't change the outcome anymore.. what's the problem with that?
For the record, it's just my opinion.. (versus your opinion)
Edit: I have not seen so many examples of people resigning their games when they know that their result doesn't affect the outcome of the challenge. I've asked my clan members a while ago about this phenomonan: all 19 were against it, And no, I'm not against it, it's somebody's own choice.. I would only do it when my position is not strong to begin with, otherwise I just play as I like to play! (even have some games going on right now where the outcome of the challenge is already decided in our favor)