Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Site Ideas Forum

Site Ideas Forum

  1. Standard member flexmore
    Quack Quack Quack !
    20 Feb '06 09:14 / 5 edits
    easy and important things for russ to do if his family doesnt need a father ....

    i think
    1/ removed players should be glued to their clan for 1 year of punishment to the clan ... thus recruiting all clan leaders and members into the cheat police.
    2/ sieges should autotimeout ... this will deal with meman owning half of the sieges ... and slow siege starters.
    3/ block user ... for challenges and messages (more important than 1 and 2 but also more difficult)
  2. Standard member Wibble Wobble
    Action barbie
    20 Feb '06 18:14 / 5 edits
    Originally posted by flexmore
    easy and important things for russ to do if his family doesnt need a father ....

    i think
    1/ removed players should be glued to their clan for 1 year of punishment to the clan ... thus recruiting all clan leaders and members into the cheat police.
    2/ sieges should autotimeout ... this will deal with meman owning half of the sieges ... and slow siege st ...[text shortened]... block user ... for challenges and messages (more important than 1 and 2 but also more difficult)
    and it took you 5 edits just to post all that?...
  3. Standard member flexmore
    Quack Quack Quack !
    21 Feb '06 07:57 / 5 edits
    Originally posted by Wibble Wobble
    and it took you 5 edits just to post all that?...
    Yes!
  4. 21 Feb '06 23:37
    Originally posted by flexmore
    easy and important things for russ to do if his family doesnt need a father ....

    i think
    1/ removed players should be glued to their clan for 1 year of punishment to the clan ... thus recruiting all clan leaders and members into the cheat police.
    Not all cases of cheating are as obvious as for example Anacondastan's or BOOYA's. I would expect clan leaders to report clan members to the game mods if they suspect cheating, but unless they are reasonably sure, I wouldn't expect or want them to throw out a suspected clan member before the person has been investigated. That's why we have the game mods. Punishing a clan for not throwing out cheaters before they are banned might lead to clan leaders throwing out innocent members because of a mere suspicion. Not a good idea.
  5. Standard member PocketKings
    Banned from edits
    22 Feb '06 15:41
    Originally posted by Nordlys
    Not all cases of cheating are as obvious as for example Anacondastan's or BOOYA's. I would expect clan leaders to report clan members to the game mods if they suspect cheating, but unless they are reasonably sure, I wouldn't expect or want them to throw out a suspected clan member before the person has been investigated. That's why we have the game mods. Pun ...[text shortened]... to clan leaders throwing out innocent members because of a mere suspicion. Not a good idea.
    you love just coming on to this forum to bash other peoples ideas
  6. 22 Feb '06 16:46
    Originally posted by PocketKings
    you love just coming on to this forum to bash other peoples ideas
    Only if they are bad.