It would appear

The post that was quoted here has been removed

You imagine a lot.

@The-only-Mr-T said
That someone who was on many many people's ignore list can ask for their account to be removed and just reappear a couple of weeks after to send PMs to the many people on said ignore lists.

And that appears to be ok?

LOL

i come here today seeking to inform folks of this very infraction!
this is as irritating as it gets!

@Kevin-Contretemps is the offender
and while i have BLOCKED HIS SORRY UNWASHED BUTT YET AGAIN

i truly think the management of the website must consider making such an action unnecessary

at the risk of being permanently banned from a website i enjoy
@Russ this is on you

put him inna ditch please

@rookie54 said
LOL

i come here today seeking to inform folks of this very infraction!
this is as irritating as it gets!

@Kevin-Contretemps is the offender
and while i have BLOCKED HIS SORRY UNWASHED BUTT YET AGAIN

i truly think the management of the website must consider making such an action unnecessary

at the risk of being permanently banned from a website i enjoy
@Russ this is on you

put him inna ditch please

Well, miracles never cease. I checked blocking his dumbass yet again and he was already blocked. The universe has my back today.

@rookie54 said
LOL

i come here today seeking to inform folks of this very infraction!
this is as irritating as it gets!

@Kevin-Contretemps is the offender
and while i have BLOCKED HIS SORRY UNWASHED BUTT YET AGAIN

i truly think the management of the website must consider making such an action unnecessary

at the risk of being permanently banned from a website i enjoy
@Russ this is on you

put him inna ditch please

TU from me, rookie.

IMO, the person is question is in violation of several clauses of RHP ToS. I've had him on ignore for some time, thanks to some clever programming by another user here, but in principle I agree that such a measure should not even be necessary. Of course, the decision rests with site admin.


ToS relevant passages in bold.

https://www.redhotpawn.com/site/terms-of-service.php

quote:
You agree to not use the Service to:

Post, email or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;
...

Post, email or otherwise make available any unsolicited or unauthorized advertising, promotional materials, "junk mail," "spam," "chain letters," "pyramid schemes," or any other form of solicitation.

...

"Stalk" or otherwise harass another; or

...

Collect or store personal data about other users.

etc.
end quote

"Spam" is perhaps the most relevant item in the ToS list quoted above. The person in question often loads up several threads with multiple posts as if talking to no one but himself. "invasive of another's privacy" is strangely ironical, in this case, as the person in question seems hell-bent on announcing to everyone who doesn't want to know personal data about his private life. I for one don't see why RHP should be someone's psychological dumping ground. There are therapists for that.

@moonbus said
.. thanks to some clever programming by another user here...

https://www.feffed.me/vraway-install.html

The best way to not feed the troll, is to not read the troll. Enjoy.

@orangutan said
https://www.feffed.me/vraway-install.html

The best way to not feed the troll, is to not read the troll. Enjoy.

Hear, hear.

DNR: do not read, do not reply, do not resuscitate.