1. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    07 Jun '10 18:15
    Hi Russ.

    There is actually very little that is wrong on here.

    Interesting to see the things that have knocked fixing the
    Black PGN thingy thing in a 'minor' spot.

    Chess960 (including tournament support)
    960chess is for bampots, stop catering for the bampots.

    If you do go ahead with this nonsense then I must insist they have
    there own forum. I don't want MY Chess Forum cluttered up with their
    silly 960 games and their dumb 960 questions.

    A decent game annotation system.

    There are 3 players who regularly annotate a game on here.
    The two Pauls and Nowakowski.

    What we have with FEN and the PGN is perfect.
    It's needs a small tweak which was promised over a year ago.

    A final games explorer release with regular updates.
    Great. The best thing about RHP is that site.

    I understand why there is a lower move limit (it looks like you don't
    show games under 10 moves). However could you add in all the games
    that end in checkmate under 10 moves.

    Improved conditional move interface.
    It works - don't tamper with things that work.

    A much improved and more reliable blitz feature with blitz rating support.

    Hardly anyone plays blitz on here.
    I just went there. 20 people, including me, no games being offered and 12
    players, including me, sitting there do nothing.

    OK snaz it up and make it graded then it might take off.

    So my promise, made over a year ago is being held up so 3 guys
    can post their analysis and you develop a chess related game that
    starts off with an illegal postion and is played by bampots.

    greenpawn is sulking big time 🙁
  2. The sky
    Joined
    05 Apr '05
    Moves
    10385
    07 Jun '10 21:24
    Originally posted by greenpawn34
    Hi Russ,

    Welcome back.

    We thought you were lost in the Pacific on the good yacht RHP.
    The Flying Chessman!
  3. Joined
    10 Jan '08
    Moves
    16950
    07 Jun '10 21:34
    Originally posted by greenpawn34
    [b]A much improved and more reliable blitz feature with blitz rating support.

    Hardly anyone plays blitz on here.[/b]
    a better blitz feature (with separate blitz ratings) would improve the site (on a marketing point of view) greatly. at the moment if you want to play blitz you go to a blitz site, if you play to play cc... but if there was a site that catered well to both formats - $$$ hello. especially if they sold separate advertising for the blitz site.
  4. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    07 Jun '10 22:21
    Originally posted by Kewpie
    1. What satisfaction is there in martyrdom? I can't see anyone getting banned just to get on the banned list.

    2. At least there'd be some dialogue in forum threads then, at the moment the forums are totally dead.

    And it'd be something useful we could do with our rotten tomatoes ...
    I take pride in being banned from Armchairgeneral!
  5. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    07 Jun '10 22:26
    Hi trev.

    as I said:

    "OK snaz it up and make it graded then it might take off. "

    I suspect it will if ratings are added to it.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree