1. Standard memberwittywonka
    Chocolate Expert
    Cocoa Mountains
    Joined
    26 Nov '06
    Moves
    19249
    29 Apr '07 00:39
    Would it be possible to allow for increments of 50 rating points (instead of current 100) when setting the rating range for open invites?
  2. Standard memberwittywonka
    Chocolate Expert
    Cocoa Mountains
    Joined
    26 Nov '06
    Moves
    19249
    29 Apr '07 14:10
    It doesn't have to be 50, but I think the rating limit for open invite min/max could be more specific...

    What do you think?
  3. Joined
    22 Aug '05
    Moves
    26450
    29 Apr '07 19:34
    Originally posted by wittywonka
    It doesn't have to be 50, but I think the rating limit for open invite min/max could be more specific...

    What do you think?
    How about 100 - would that suit you?
  4. Standard memberwittywonka
    Chocolate Expert
    Cocoa Mountains
    Joined
    26 Nov '06
    Moves
    19249
    29 Apr '07 19:54
    Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
    How about 100 - would that suit you?
    Oops, maybe I wasn't clear enough...

    I meant that the rating min./max. for open invites should be in increments of 50...it's already 100, isn't it?

    For example, I'm rated 1441...it would be nice if I could have an open invite only allowing players rated between 1450 and 1500 to accept (rather than the typical 1400-1500) or maybe only 1400-1450 range.

    Do you see what I'm saying?
  5. USA
    Joined
    02 Mar '07
    Moves
    8808
    29 Apr '07 20:08
    Originally posted by wittywonka
    Oops, maybe I wasn't clear enough...

    I meant that the rating min./max. for open invites should be in increments of 50...it's already 100, isn't it?

    For example, I'm rated 1441...it would be nice if I could have an open invite only allowing players rated between 1450 and 1500 to accept (rather than the typical 1400-1500) or maybe only 1400-1450 range.

    Do you see what I'm saying?
    yes
  6. Subscribercoquette
    Already mated
    Omaha, Nebraska, USA
    Joined
    04 Jul '06
    Moves
    887720
    30 Apr '07 04:58
    Originally posted by wittywonka
    Oops, maybe I wasn't clear enough...

    I meant that the rating min./max. for open invites should be in increments of 50...it's already 100, isn't it?

    For example, I'm rated 1441...it would be nice if I could have an open invite only allowing players rated between 1450 and 1500 to accept (rather than the typical 1400-1500) or maybe only 1400-1450 range.

    Do you see what I'm saying?
    I don't have a problem with your request and it should be a very easy enhancement to make it ANY minimum or ANY maximum you enter; however, i think that the ratings aren't all that stable, so it really doesn't matter . . .no harm in doing as you suggest however.
  7. Joined
    22 Aug '05
    Moves
    26450
    30 Apr '07 05:50
    Meanwhile you could name the games "between xxxx and yyyy ratings only" and delete any that are accepted by anyone who is not.
    That's a lot of messing around though.....
  8. Joined
    25 Jan '07
    Moves
    1737
    30 Apr '07 19:31
    I actually have an issue with this new feature and a suggestion to fix it.

    I find it annoying that when I try to find a game to play via the Open Invites, there are people rated in the 1300s-1500s only accepting players that are >2000. It's very annoying because not only are there very rarely anyone to accept, it's silly that these mediocre players only want to play great players. My suggestion is to limit the min/max to something like 200 or 300 points above and below your own rating. It would increase the amount of Open Invites that can be accepted, and the matches would be more even.


    Thanks.
  9. Joined
    22 Aug '05
    Moves
    26450
    30 Apr '07 20:372 edits
    Originally posted by RedHerring
    My suggestion is to limit the min/max to something like 200 or 300 points above and below your own rating. It would increase the amount of Open Invites that can be accepted, and the matches would be more even.


    Thanks.
    Often been suggested.

    I don't think it's what wittywonka meant though.
  10. Standard memberwittywonka
    Chocolate Expert
    Cocoa Mountains
    Joined
    26 Nov '06
    Moves
    19249
    30 Apr '07 20:45
    Originally posted by RedHerring
    I actually have an issue with this new feature and a suggestion to fix it.

    I find it annoying that when I try to find a game to play via the Open Invites, there are people rated in the 1300s-1500s only accepting players that are >2000. It's very annoying because not only are there very rarely anyone to accept, it's silly that these mediocre players on ...[text shortened]... amount of Open Invites that can be accepted, and the matches would be more even.


    Thanks.
    Yeah, as Dr.Strangelove mentioned, that's an okay idea, I guess, (although those games don't actually hurt anything or hender anything), but I just wanted to have more specification in selecting the rating.
  11. Subscribercoquette
    Already mated
    Omaha, Nebraska, USA
    Joined
    04 Jul '06
    Moves
    887720
    01 May '07 04:15
    Originally posted by RedHerring
    I actually have an issue with this new feature and a suggestion to fix it.

    I find it annoying that when I try to find a game to play via the Open Invites, there are people rated in the 1300s-1500s only accepting players that are >2000. It's very annoying because not only are there very rarely anyone to accept, it's silly that these mediocre players on ...[text shortened]... amount of Open Invites that can be accepted, and the matches would be more even.


    Thanks.
    i have the same reaction, but i don't really care . . . . accept or reject . . it doesn't matter to me . . if a 2000 player actually plays a 1000 player . .maybe it's for a noble reason . .to teach and help her learn!
  12. Standard memberwittywonka
    Chocolate Expert
    Cocoa Mountains
    Joined
    26 Nov '06
    Moves
    19249
    14 May '07 02:34
    bump
Back to Top