Anyone who is still reading these public forums must be as fed up as I am.
Another site where I hang out - http://www.angrybirdsnest.com/forum/ - has just revised their huge and complex set of forums to four, plus private-style forums for each of their products.
If the RHP public forums were limited to the same four I think it would produce a significant improvement in forum content, as it seems to have done there.
- a general discussion forum, for both serious and light-hearted stuff which has little or nothing to do with chess
- a site support forum, including announcements, help requests and so on
- a chess-only forum
- and (possibly, I personally think we could do without it) something like "the RHP coffee lounge".
I'm interested to see if there is any support for this idea.
Originally posted by KewpieRaise your right paw if you're for it, your left paw if against.
Anyone who is still reading these public forums must be as fed up as I am.
Another site where I hang out - http://www.angrybirdsnest.com/forum/ - has just revised their huge and complex set of forums to four, plus private-style forums for each of their products.
If the RHP public forums were limited to the same four I think it would produce a signific ...[text shortened]... ng like "the RHP coffee lounge".
I'm interested to see if there is any support for this idea.
Back right if you're unsure, back left if unaffiliated.
Originally posted by KewpieNot interested.
Anyone who is still reading these public forums must be as fed up as I am.
Another site where I hang out - http://www.angrybirdsnest.com/forum/ - has just revised their huge and complex set of forums to four, plus private-style forums for each of their products.
If the RHP public forums were limited to the same four I think it would produce a signific ...[text shortened]... ng like "the RHP coffee lounge".
I'm interested to see if there is any support for this idea.
But thanks for posting a link in the general forum sending me to this so i can say how much bollox i think the idea is.
Angry birds....woo hoo. (never played it or even seen a screen shot)
Originally posted by KewpieI think we could safely get rid of culture, developers, posers and puzzles, and sports. Or at least, I wouldn't care if we did.
Anyone who is still reading these public forums must be as fed up as I am.
Another site where I hang out - http://www.angrybirdsnest.com/forum/ - has just revised their huge and complex set of forums to four, plus private-style forums for each of their products.
If the RHP public forums were limited to the same four I think it would produce a signific ...[text shortened]... ng like "the RHP coffee lounge".
I'm interested to see if there is any support for this idea.
Definitely keep Spirituality (one of my favorite ones, and one of the most active) and Debates (just so that kind of crap stays out of the other forums).
Originally posted by SwissGambitI agree with this; get rid of "Clubs forum" also.
I think we could safely get rid of culture, developers, posers and puzzles, and sports. Or at least, I wouldn't care if we did.
Definitely keep Spirituality (one of my favorite ones, and one of the most active) and Debates (just so that kind of crap stays out of the other forums).
Originally posted by KewpieOn this forum it would be nice to have some response from Russ or whoever is running the site
Anyone who is still reading these public forums must be as fed up as I am.
Another site where I hang out - http://www.angrybirdsnest.com/forum/ - has just revised their huge and complex set of forums to four, plus private-style forums for each of their products.
If the RHP public forums were limited to the same four I think it would produce a signific ...[text shortened]... ng like "the RHP coffee lounge".
I'm interested to see if there is any support for this idea.
There a lots of ideas but no response as to why they cannot be implemented they just fade away into obscurity
Originally posted by padgerIf fading is a problem support the "list of accepted proposals" thread.
On this forum it would be nice to have some response from Russ or whoever is running the site
There a lots of ideas but no response as to why they cannot be implemented they just fade away into obscurity
Thread 155265