RHB Administrators: You're on notice.
One or more of you have been removing my account(s). The only reason I made more than one in the first place is because you took down my content on the first and only post I ever made, and then revoked my forum rights for YEARS arbitrarily. But now you're trying to throw your weight around, so I am officially your problem.
You can continue to ban my accounts. Block my IPs. Bots will be making accounts indefinitely and the online script kiddy community is going to be using this site for pentesting practice for the next 20 years. You know, after I get bored making guest appearances on here myself.
Kindly go f* yourselves.
@charlie1988 saidI am very astonished. If I read to the drivel that is posted withut any consequence to get a VERY LONG ban for a first and single post means probability is very high that your post was VERY bad.
RHB Administrators: You're on notice.
One or more of you have been removing my account(s). The only reason I made more than one in the first place is because you took down my content on the first and only post I ever made, and then revoked my forum rights for YEARS arbitrarily. But now you're trying to throw your weight around, so I am officially your problem.
You ...[text shortened]... rs. You know, after I get bored making guest appearances on here myself.
Kindly go f* yourselves.
Threatening is not a good stance anyway. Even though I am not part of the site other than being a paying member, I would offer you to contact me if you want any mediation.
- Joined
- 06 Nov 15
- Moves
- 41301
@ponderable saidMediation my ass: To hell with the jerk.
I am very astonished. If I read to the drivel that is posted withut any consequence to get a VERY LONG ban for a first and single post means probability is very high that your post was VERY bad.
Threatening is not a good stance anyway. Even though I am not part of the site other than being a paying member, I would offer you to contact me if you want any mediation.
Hopefully, more multi-account abusers will be tossed.
Good riddance!
hello all players!
I would like to discuss about tournaments na!
why no tournaments 1200-1900 or others rating like 1200-1800...
all the players who have more 1950 are just to play for training and not exchange on the game!
The site don't say nothing and I would like to exchange about that.
I hope to have answer.
Thanks.
JM
@ponderable saidObjectively it wasn't, but I did criticize how after more than a decade you still have to refresh your game pages, and may have alluded to questioning the use of subscribers' money if they couldn't handle that much, and mentioned another chess site (clearly not in advertisement).
I am very astonished. If I read to the drivel that is posted withut any consequence to get a VERY LONG ban for a first and single post means probability is very high that your post was VERY bad.
Threatening is not a good stance anyway. Even though I am not part of the site other than being a paying member, I would offer you to contact me if you want any mediation.
Gesture appreciated, but it wasn't threatening, it was just informational. Some moderators just used quick judgement and when I questioned it someone had a god complex. The world could use more calm discussion, but they still have a site to run and probably don't consider one-offs a problem. So we'll see.
- Joined
- 11 Nov 14
- Moves
- 38428
@charles1988 said55 plus stone or kg?
You strike me as the kind of guy who reaches conclusions quickly and sticks to them. Probably 55+?
@charles1988 saidUh-oh. See what we've done? We've gone and upset the alpha-geek, and now he's going to give us some free entertainment. 😂😂😂
Objectively it wasn't, but I did criticize how after more than a decade you still have to refresh your game pages, and may have alluded to questioning the use of subscribers' money if they couldn't handle that much, and mentioned another chess site (clearly not in advertisement).
Gesture appreciated, but it wasn't threatening, it was just informational. Some moderator ...[text shortened]... ion, but they still have a site to run and probably don't consider one-offs a problem. So we'll see.
@BigDoggProblem
Previously banned player banned again, now with a documented threat against the site, which can be passed (with all supporting details) to the authorities if need be.
- Joined
- 06 Nov 15
- Moves
- 41301
@charles1988 saidI'm guessing that you know how your petty rant made you sound like a child.
You strike me as the kind of guy who reaches conclusions quickly and sticks to them. Probably 55+?
What? Maybe 13-?
@russ saidSorry Russ, there's two of them. Might be a good idea to remove the thread too.
@BigDoggProblem
Previously banned player banned again, now with a documented threat against the site, which can be passed (with all supporting details) to the authorities if need be.
@charlie1988 saidWhich Womble are you again?
RHB Administrators: You're on notice.
One or more of you have been removing my account(s). The only reason I made more than one in the first place is because you took down my content on the first and only post I ever made, and then revoked my forum rights for YEARS arbitrarily. But now you're trying to throw your weight around, so I am officially your problem.
You ...[text shortened]... rs. You know, after I get bored making guest appearances on here myself.
Kindly go f* yourselves.
Hopefully not Orinoco. I liked Orinoco.
@very-rusty saidI'll bet admins wouldn't even need to keep the post public or even visible if that were the case. Makes you wonder why they left it up.
I am assuming the thread would need to be kept as evidence it was said.
-VR