1. Standard memberIcky Ike
    Pro-Complainer
    California
    Joined
    16 Mar '06
    Moves
    34887
    05 Nov '06 21:46
    Can we have an option to filter non-subscribers out of the player tables. There are far too many non-subcribers that have less than 100 moves and 0 moves this month. And since some subscribers like myself are strictly tournament and/or clan match players the current player tables don't really provide an accurate table of our competition.
  2. Joined
    22 Aug '05
    Moves
    26450
    05 Nov '06 22:30
    Originally posted by ItalyBoyBlue
    Can we have an option to filter non-subscribers out of the player tables. There are far too many non-subcribers that have less than 100 moves and 0 moves this month. And since some subscribers like myself are strictly tournament and/or clan match players the current player tables don't really provide an accurate table of our competition.
    😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴🙄
  3. THORNINYOURSIDE
    Joined
    04 Sep '04
    Moves
    245624
    06 Nov '06 19:37
    Originally posted by ItalyBoyBlue
    Can we have an option to filter non-subscribers out of the player tables.
    There are far too many non-subcribers that have less than 100 moves and 0 moves this month.
    And since some subscribers like myself are strictly tournament and/or clan match players the current player tables don't really provide an accurate table of our competition.
    Why? Are they not players like yourself?
    So what, there are many subs in the same position!
    Why not play normal games as well.

    What next, filters to take account of

    Rating
    Moves per day
    Weekday only movers
    Weekend only movers
    Movers who have lost most games in a month
    Movers who have won most games in a month
    Movers who have lost most games in under 20 moves
    Movers who have won most games in under 20 moves
    Movers who have fallen for fools mate
    Movers who have been timed out most per month
    Movers who timeout opponents
    Movers who do not want to appear in tables

    etc
  4. Gloucestershire , UK
    Joined
    16 Aug '04
    Moves
    22364
    09 Nov '06 00:20
    i don't think its such a bad idea
  5. Standard memberIcky Ike
    Pro-Complainer
    California
    Joined
    16 Mar '06
    Moves
    34887
    12 Nov '06 12:30
    Originally posted by adramforall
    Why? Are they not players like yourself?
    So what, there are many subs in the same position!
    Why not play normal games as well.

    What next, filters to take account of

    Rating
    Moves per day
    Weekday only movers
    Weekend only movers
    Movers who have lost most games in a month
    Movers who have won most games in a month
    Movers who have lost most ga ...[text shortened]... most per month
    Movers who timeout opponents
    Movers who do not want to appear in tables

    etc
    I suggest you look up the word "inane" in the dictionary and then maybe paste your picture right next to it. The idea is put forth as something that would be optional. If you don't like it then don't worry about it. This thread is for others that might be interested in it.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree