Tournament for non-subscribers (once each three or four months):
participants: 32 without ranking limits (or moRe)
1st pLace: free subscription! (for a yeaR)
Originally posted by aGoRessivE Tournament for non-subscribers (once each three or four months):
participants: 32 without ranking limits (or moRe)
1st pLace: free subscription! (for a yeaR)
It would be very interestinG..šµ
I want a free meal, RHP should make a burger for me NOW.
Originally posted by aGoRessivE 1st pLace: free subscription! (for a yeaR)
I suspect that suggestions for discounted (or free) subscriptions from non-subscribers just come off as cheapness. (I include suggestions for more subscriber-like functionality for non-subscribers as a "discount".)
I wouldn't make any such suggestions until I were a subscriber. Then the readers know it's not niggardliness but just a suggestion for a better community.
Originally posted by Jesse Custer I suspect that suggestions for discounted (or free) subscriptions from non-subscribers just come off as cheapness. (I include suggestions for more subscriber-like functionality for non-subscribers as a "discount".)
I wouldn't make any such suggestions until I were a subscriber. Then the readers know it's not niggardliness but just a suggestion for a better community.
I purchased a burger today, but I'm going to want a free one tomorrow. That's my idea of an ideal community.
Russ has said in the past that such a tournament would be an open invitation to non-sub cheaters and has even turned down offers from members who wish to sponsor such a tournament.
No. They definitely should not have that. The idea of subscribing IS their business. If you owned a business, you would not give it away just to be 'nice'.