1. SubscriberPonderable
    chemist
    Linkenheim
    Joined
    22 Apr '05
    Moves
    518236
    27 May '08 15:06
    I would suggest that on a person on vacation there is an information about the end of the vacation.
  2. Standard memberPhlabibit
    Mystic Meg
    tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4
    Joined
    27 Mar '03
    Moves
    17242
    27 May '08 15:28
    Originally posted by Ponderable
    I would suggest that on a person on vacation there is an information about the end of the vacation.
    That's been asked before... but imagine I set myself for 14 days, wait 2 and cancel.

    Now you've run off thinking I'm gone 14 days and I start moving.

    That may be why this request has not been answered.

    P-
  3. SubscriberPonderable
    chemist
    Linkenheim
    Joined
    22 Apr '05
    Moves
    518236
    27 May '08 15:50
    Originally posted by Phlabibit
    That's been asked before... but imagine I set myself for 14 days, wait 2 and cancel.

    Now you've run off thinking I'm gone 14 days and I start moving.

    That may be why this request has not been answered.

    P-
    so my next suggestion would be: booking of vacations can't be taken back.
  4. Subscribercoquette
    Already mated
    Omaha, Nebraska, USA
    Joined
    04 Jul '06
    Moves
    890095
    27 May '08 18:17
    Originally posted by Ponderable
    so my next suggestion would be: booking of vacations can't be taken back.
    Or, how about cannot be withdrawn for at least a 48-hour time period from the time of rescheduling . . with an email notification sent out?

    Maybe this is why they aren't doing it?
  5. Standard memberPhlabibit
    Mystic Meg
    tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4
    Joined
    27 Mar '03
    Moves
    17242
    27 May '08 21:06
    Originally posted by Ponderable
    so my next suggestion would be: booking of vacations can't be taken back.
    A good question here is "Why?" If your answer is "To punish those that abuse the system" I'd call this a bad idea.

    Imagine you've got big plans to take a dream vacation... and at the last minute the vacation is pushed back a week or 2 or even canceled.

    Now, not only are you bent about your vacation being ruined or postponed, you can't turn off your vacation because of a new rule at RHP. And what was the reason for this change to the vacation system?

    P-
  6. SubscriberPonderable
    chemist
    Linkenheim
    Joined
    22 Apr '05
    Moves
    518236
    29 May '08 10:46
    Originally posted by Phlabibit
    A good question here is "Why?" If your answer is "To punish those that abuse the system" I'd call this a bad idea.

    Imagine you've got big plans to take a dream vacation... and at the last minute the vacation is pushed back a week or 2 or even canceled.

    Now, not only are you bent about your vacation being ruined or postponed, you can't turn off your ...[text shortened]... a new rule at RHP. And what was the reason for this change to the vacation system?

    P-
    Why?

    Actually timebanks are there to provide time for unforseen absence. Then we do have a lot of vacation days to use. In fact I can't see for whom these may not suffice. (People who know that they are unable to log in should play long time controls anyway).

    So even if I have the bad luck to have a vacation moved I have so mayn vacation days that I can make up for it. Plus I can first let timebank tick down.

    But if I am the only one supporting this it's ok if the end is not displayed.
  7. SubscriberVery Rusty
    Treat Everyone Equal
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    Joined
    04 Oct '06
    Moves
    415818
    06 Jun '08 05:541 edit
    It doesn't happen alot

    But........


    I agree with Phlabs ! Just too many unknown things could arise !
Back to Top