Originally posted by Starrman
It does no such thing, it merely attempts to seek empirical answers to objective questions. Foolish attempts to mould the subjectivity of religion into the equation cause that process to break down. I have no idea what you mean when you say world view, science is a methodological process, religion is a world view. If you intend to mean that most scientis me outcome by definition of their method. That's much more akin to religion than to science.
I have no idea what you mean when you say world view, science is a methodological process, religion is a world view.
Holding the idea that the (really, a) scientific method as the best arbiter of reality is, by definition, a worldview. The process itself is not a worldview, agreed.
... the people conducting the drowning had no scientific process in mind.
They did not conduct experiments for purposes of testing a hypothesis? They did not predict and prove an idea? Come now, you can do much better than this.
... they would always cause the same outcome by definition of their method.
That is an assumption of underlying principles and/or motivations, not a retelling of their stated intents.
That's much more akin to religion than to science.
In the name of religion, in the name of country, in the name of science... it's all about power, baby.