Originally posted by FreakyKBHConsidering that Noah is a myth which was rewritten from a Babylonian fable dating over 1000 years before the Hebrews claimed it happened.
Even if Noah's Ark is confirmed on Mt. Ararat, it still will not be proof enough.
If you founf the hammer of Thor that would not be enough either.
1 edit
Originally posted by caissad4It would be a pretty cool trinket to put on your mantelpiece, though (Mjööllnir, not the Ark).
Considering that Noah is a myth which was rewritten from a Babylonian fable dating over 1000 years before the Hebrews claimed it happened.
If you founf the hammer of Thor that would not be enough either.
Originally posted by caissad4I see. So, because (as you claim) the Babylonian myth was told prior to Moses' account, this invalidates the veracity of the event? And, if the material in view is found to be the remnants of an ark, we should take a more serious look at Gilgamesh, Popol Vuh, or Nez Pierce teachings?
Considering that Noah is a myth which was rewritten from a Babylonian fable dating over 1000 years before the Hebrews claimed it happened.
If you founf the hammer of Thor that would not be enough either.
I will revise my assertion:
Even if the material currently in view is found to match every description possible found in the Bible, it still won't be enough.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHThis would seem to me to be self evident, so what's your point?
I see. So, because (as you claim) the Babylonian myth was told prior to Moses' account, this invalidates the veracity of the event? And, if the material in view is found to be the remnants of an ark, we should take a more serious look at Gilgamesh, Popol Vuh, or Nez Pierce teachings?
I will revise my assertion:
Even if the material currently in view is found to match every description possible found in the Bible, it still won't be enough.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHIf you accept the story of noahs ark does that mean that you accept evolution from that point forward ? Otherwise how else would the immense variety of life on this planet exist? Did it all evolve from what was carried on the ark?
Even if Noah's Ark is confirmed on Mt. Ararat, it still will not be proof enough.
Originally posted by David CHello David. Guess we'll have to wait until the Ark is discovered to find out whether it won't be enough and for what. Personally I think Freaky's was a bit depressed when he posted; his prediction an ontological moan. Something like Tibetan thigh-bone music (Telerion's violin makes for a nice World Music mix).
Proof enough of what? Utnapishtim's historical existence? No, although it's a start.
so how are they going to prove this??? if they find a piece of timber on top its like finding a chunck of wood at calvary!! no faith in what you belive is the truth im a christian so altho there is mention of certain events that are in the bible documented by others its the teachinig of how to live by gods law that counts
Originally posted by Bosse de NageIndeed, Bosse. Perhaps Freaky could take comfort in the knowledge that even Ron Wyatt was unable to convince those secular liberal atheist bastards of the truth of his Mt. Ararat discoveres. Why, they've even managed to seditiously corrupt that bastion of Young Earth Creationists everywhere, AIG:
Hello David. Guess we'll have to wait until the Ark is discovered to find out whether it won't be enough and for what. Personally I think Freaky's was a bit depressed when he posted; his prediction an ontological moan. Something like Tibetan thigh-bone music (Telerion's violin makes for a nice World Music mix).
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v14/i4/report.asp