24 Jun 12
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=vOo5jWPZZjU&feature=endscreen
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=YL8eq6Q9I-Y&feature=endscreen
Part 2
&feature=relmfu
Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=6WTWo5ScgII&feature=endscreen
Part 4
&feature=relmfu
Part 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=yLzpINByY-o&feature=endscreen
Part 6
&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=qGdN_k759RE&feature=endscreen
24 Jun 12
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsBeware of this false teacher also:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=vOo5jWPZZjU&feature=endscreen
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=YL8eq6Q9I-Y&feature=endscreen
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1qz5mr3ABE&feature=relmfu
Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=6WTWo5ScgII&feature=endscreen
Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaNHNRqhLNM&feature=relmfu
...[text shortened]... =r57xzCj5kHE&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=qGdN_k759RE&feature=endscreen
User 626584
24 Jun 12
Originally posted by sonhouseWhat are the false teachings and your proof?
Beware of this false teacher also:
User 626584
24 Jun 12
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsWhat are your true teachings and what is your proof? On my side are hundreds of years of solid science that can change and has led to all the things you would sorely miss if they were taken away like GPS, TIVO, LED TV sets, computers, modern telescopes, well maybe not for you since telescopes show actual reality, which you avoid like the plague.
What are the false teachings and your proof?
Here is an example of real science in action:
http://phys.org/news/2012-06-line-blurs-animal-monkeys-math.html
You can't even see the difference between origins of life and evolution as separate sciences, you can never change, 20,000 years from now if you were alive you would still be trying to sell the same old religious nonsense but by then they would have put you in the loony bin because the world would have actually grown up by then and put the obsessive need for religion way behind them.
25 Jun 12
Originally posted by sonhouseI have no problem with real science that give us things like GPS, TIVO, LED TV sets, computers, modern telescopes that show us actual reality. It is evolutionary science with its fairy tale reality that I object to.
What are your true teachings and what is your proof? On my side are hundreds of years of solid science that can change and has led to all the things you would sorely miss if they were taken away like GPS, TIVO, LED TV sets, computers, modern telescopes, well maybe not for you since telescopes show actual reality, which you avoid like the plague.
Here is ...[text shortened]... d would have actually grown up by then and put the obsessive need for religion way behind them.
The experiments in your link does not mean monkeys, baboons, orangutans, and bonobos are our relatives. Horses can think and count, so can dogs. There are many animals that can do some of the things we do at a limited level. Parrots can talk; but I bet none of these apes can say a word. All of this is only evidence of a common designer -- God!
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord!
25 Jun 12
Originally posted by RJHindsand you probably make use of modern medicine too. you didn't mention that part. probably because much of modern medicine is based on our knowledge of evolution. one of the real, practical sciences in your life.
I have no problem with real science that give us things like GPS, TIVO, LED TV sets, computers, modern telescopes that show us actual reality. It is evolutionary science with its fairy tale reality that I object to.
The experiments in your link does not mean monkeys, baboons, orangutans, and bonobos are our relatives. Horses can think and count, so can ...[text shortened]... . All of this is only evidence of a common designer -- God!
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord!
25 Jun 12
1 edit
Originally posted by VoidSpiritORIGIN OF LIFE. Why do textbooks claim that the 1953 Miller-Urey experiment shows how life's building blocks may have formed on the early Earth -- when conditions on the early Earth were probably nothing like those used in the experiment, and the origin of life remains a mystery?
and you probably make use of modern medicine too. you didn't mention that part. probably because much of modern medicine is based on our knowledge of evolution. one of the real, practical sciences in your life.
DARWIN'S TREE OF LIFE. Why don't textbooks discuss the "Cambrian explosion," in which all major animal groups appear together in the fossil record fully formed instead of branching from a common ancestor -- thus contradicting the evolutionary tree of life?
HOMOLOGY. Why do textbooks define homology as similarity due to common ancestry, then claim that it is evidence for common ancestry -- a circular argument masquerading as scientific evidence?
VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS. Why do textbooks use drawings of similarities in vertebrate embryos as evidence for their common ancestry -- even though biologists have known for over a century that vertebrate embryos are not most similar in their early stages, and the drawings are faked?
ARCHAEOPTERYX. Why do textbooks portray this fossil as the missing link between dinosaurs and modern birds -- even though modern birds are probably not descended from it, and its supposed ancestors do not appear until millions of years after it?
PEPPERED MOTHS. Why do textbooks use pictures of peppered moths camouflaged on tree trunks as evidence for natural selection -- when biologists have known since the 1980s that the moths don't normally rest on tree trunks, and all the pictures have been staged?
DARWIN'S FINCHES. Why do textbooks claim that beak changes in Galapagos finches during a severe drought can explain the origin of species by natural selection -- even though the changes were reversed after the drought ended, and no net evolution occurred?
MUTANT FRUIT FLIES. Why do textbooks use fruit flies with an extra pair of wings as evidence that DNA mutations can supply raw materials for evolution -- even though the extra wings have no muscles and these disabled mutants cannot survive outside the laboratory?
HUMAN ORIGINS. Why are artists' drawings of ape-like humans used to justify materialistic claims that we are just animals and our existence is a mere accident -- when fossil experts cannot even agree on who our supposed ancestors were or what they looked like?
EVOLUTION A FACT? Why are we told that Darwin's theory of evolution is a scientific fact -- even though many of its claims are based on misrepresentations of the facts?
ANSWER. Evolutionists want to indoctrinate young people into believing evolution is a fact.
25 Jun 12
Originally posted by VoidSpiritBy the way modern medical science advancement had nothing to do with the use of evolutionary knowledge. All medical advancements were acheived by those scientists who did not even think about evolution in the course of their discoveries. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
that old thread where i gave you (creationists) the opportunity to appeal creationism by presenting any practical applications and accurate predictions it could make is still waiting for you.
25 Jun 12
Originally posted by RJHindscomplete bunkum. looks like you already smoked it.
By the way modern medical science advancement had nothing to do with the use of evolutionary knowledge. All medical advancements were acheived by those scientists who did not even think about evolution in the course of their discoveries. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
25 Jun 12
evolution theory applied to medicine:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/medicine_01
evolution theory applied to agriculture:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/agriculture_01
evolution theory applied to conservation:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/conservation_01
evolution theory applied to biofuels:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/news/090401_biofuels
evolution theory applied to forensics:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/news/090401_biofuels
more evolution theory at work in society:
http://www.actionbioscience.org/newfrontiers/bull.html
practical applications from creationism theory:
zip. nil. nada. big 0
25 Jun 12
Originally posted by VoidSpiritThis is all made up after the fact by evolutionists. The medical scientists say they do not even think about evolution while doing their research.
evolution theory applied to medicine:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/medicine_01
evolution theory applied to agriculture:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/agriculture_01
evolution theory applied to conservation:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/conservation_01
evolution theory ...[text shortened]... ontiers/bull.html
practical applications from creationism theory:
zip. nil. nada. big 0
http://scienceagainstevolution.org/v13i11f.htm
26 Jun 12
Originally posted by RJHindsthere is nothing scientific in your link source. the practical applications of evolution remain unassailed, and you remain a douche.
This is all made up after the fact by evolutionists. The medical scientists say they do not even think about evolution while doing their research.
http://scienceagainstevolution.org/v13i11f.htm
Originally posted by VoidSpiritI think you will like this. He can be your young hero doing battle with my young hero.
there is nothing scientific in your link source. the practical applications of evolution remain unassailed, and you remain a douche.
P.S. The following is the video he was arguing against from my young hero: