1. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12694
    24 Jun '12 02:04
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=vOo5jWPZZjU&feature=endscreen

    Part 1
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=YL8eq6Q9I-Y&feature=endscreen

    Part 2
    YouTube&feature=relmfu

    Part 3
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=6WTWo5ScgII&feature=endscreen

    Part 4
    YouTube&feature=relmfu

    Part 5
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=yLzpINByY-o&feature=endscreen

    Part 6
    YouTube&feature=relmfu

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=qGdN_k759RE&feature=endscreen
  2. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12694
    24 Jun '12 09:571 edit
    Reply to the first false teacher.
    http://www.christianforums.com/t7235369/

    http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cm/v18/n2/replenish

    http://www.ldolphin.org/unruh/alien/ch3ph.html
  3. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52618
    24 Jun '12 11:161 edit
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=vOo5jWPZZjU&feature=endscreen

    Part 1
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=YL8eq6Q9I-Y&feature=endscreen

    Part 2
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1qz5mr3ABE&feature=relmfu

    Part 3
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=6WTWo5ScgII&feature=endscreen

    Part 4
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaNHNRqhLNM&feature=relmfu
    ...[text shortened]... =r57xzCj5kHE&feature=relmfu

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=qGdN_k759RE&feature=endscreen
    Beware of this false teacher also:

    User 626584
  4. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12694
    24 Jun '12 16:18
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Beware of this false teacher also:

    User 626584
    What are the false teachings and your proof?
  5. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52618
    24 Jun '12 22:071 edit
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    What are the false teachings and your proof?
    What are your true teachings and what is your proof? On my side are hundreds of years of solid science that can change and has led to all the things you would sorely miss if they were taken away like GPS, TIVO, LED TV sets, computers, modern telescopes, well maybe not for you since telescopes show actual reality, which you avoid like the plague.

    Here is an example of real science in action:

    http://phys.org/news/2012-06-line-blurs-animal-monkeys-math.html

    You can't even see the difference between origins of life and evolution as separate sciences, you can never change, 20,000 years from now if you were alive you would still be trying to sell the same old religious nonsense but by then they would have put you in the loony bin because the world would have actually grown up by then and put the obsessive need for religion way behind them.
  6. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12694
    25 Jun '12 00:33
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    What are your true teachings and what is your proof? On my side are hundreds of years of solid science that can change and has led to all the things you would sorely miss if they were taken away like GPS, TIVO, LED TV sets, computers, modern telescopes, well maybe not for you since telescopes show actual reality, which you avoid like the plague.

    Here is ...[text shortened]... d would have actually grown up by then and put the obsessive need for religion way behind them.
    I have no problem with real science that give us things like GPS, TIVO, LED TV sets, computers, modern telescopes that show us actual reality. It is evolutionary science with its fairy tale reality that I object to.

    The experiments in your link does not mean monkeys, baboons, orangutans, and bonobos are our relatives. Horses can think and count, so can dogs. There are many animals that can do some of the things we do at a limited level. Parrots can talk; but I bet none of these apes can say a word. All of this is only evidence of a common designer -- God!

    HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord!
  7. Joined
    10 Jun '11
    Moves
    3829
    25 Jun '12 00:55
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    I have no problem with real science that give us things like GPS, TIVO, LED TV sets, computers, modern telescopes that show us actual reality. It is evolutionary science with its fairy tale reality that I object to.

    The experiments in your link does not mean monkeys, baboons, orangutans, and bonobos are our relatives. Horses can think and count, so can ...[text shortened]... . All of this is only evidence of a common designer -- God!

    HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord!
    and you probably make use of modern medicine too. you didn't mention that part. probably because much of modern medicine is based on our knowledge of evolution. one of the real, practical sciences in your life.
  8. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12694
    25 Jun '12 01:181 edit
    Originally posted by VoidSpirit
    and you probably make use of modern medicine too. you didn't mention that part. probably because much of modern medicine is based on our knowledge of evolution. one of the real, practical sciences in your life.
    ORIGIN OF LIFE. Why do textbooks claim that the 1953 Miller-Urey experiment shows how life's building blocks may have formed on the early Earth -- when conditions on the early Earth were probably nothing like those used in the experiment, and the origin of life remains a mystery?

    DARWIN'S TREE OF LIFE. Why don't textbooks discuss the "Cambrian explosion," in which all major animal groups appear together in the fossil record fully formed instead of branching from a common ancestor -- thus contradicting the evolutionary tree of life?

    HOMOLOGY. Why do textbooks define homology as similarity due to common ancestry, then claim that it is evidence for common ancestry -- a circular argument masquerading as scientific evidence?

    VERTEBRATE EMBRYOS. Why do textbooks use drawings of similarities in vertebrate embryos as evidence for their common ancestry -- even though biologists have known for over a century that vertebrate embryos are not most similar in their early stages, and the drawings are faked?

    ARCHAEOPTERYX. Why do textbooks portray this fossil as the missing link between dinosaurs and modern birds -- even though modern birds are probably not descended from it, and its supposed ancestors do not appear until millions of years after it?

    PEPPERED MOTHS. Why do textbooks use pictures of peppered moths camouflaged on tree trunks as evidence for natural selection -- when biologists have known since the 1980s that the moths don't normally rest on tree trunks, and all the pictures have been staged?

    DARWIN'S FINCHES. Why do textbooks claim that beak changes in Galapagos finches during a severe drought can explain the origin of species by natural selection -- even though the changes were reversed after the drought ended, and no net evolution occurred?

    MUTANT FRUIT FLIES. Why do textbooks use fruit flies with an extra pair of wings as evidence that DNA mutations can supply raw materials for evolution -- even though the extra wings have no muscles and these disabled mutants cannot survive outside the laboratory?

    HUMAN ORIGINS. Why are artists' drawings of ape-like humans used to justify materialistic claims that we are just animals and our existence is a mere accident -- when fossil experts cannot even agree on who our supposed ancestors were or what they looked like?

    EVOLUTION A FACT? Why are we told that Darwin's theory of evolution is a scientific fact -- even though many of its claims are based on misrepresentations of the facts?

    ANSWER. Evolutionists want to indoctrinate young people into believing evolution is a fact.
  9. Joined
    10 Jun '11
    Moves
    3829
    25 Jun '12 01:232 edits
    that old thread where i gave you (creationists) the opportunity to appeal creationism by presenting any practical applications and accurate predictions it could make is still waiting for you.
  10. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12694
    25 Jun '12 01:29
    Originally posted by VoidSpirit
    that old thread where i gave you (creationists) the opportunity to appeal creationism by presenting any practical applications and accurate predictions it could make is still waiting for you.
    By the way modern medical science advancement had nothing to do with the use of evolutionary knowledge. All medical advancements were acheived by those scientists who did not even think about evolution in the course of their discoveries. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
  11. Joined
    10 Jun '11
    Moves
    3829
    25 Jun '12 06:36
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    By the way modern medical science advancement had nothing to do with the use of evolutionary knowledge. All medical advancements were acheived by those scientists who did not even think about evolution in the course of their discoveries. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
    complete bunkum. looks like you already smoked it.
  12. Joined
    10 Jun '11
    Moves
    3829
    25 Jun '12 06:49
    evolution theory applied to medicine:
    http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/medicine_01

    evolution theory applied to agriculture:
    http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/agriculture_01

    evolution theory applied to conservation:
    http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/conservation_01

    evolution theory applied to biofuels:
    http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/news/090401_biofuels

    evolution theory applied to forensics:
    http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/news/090401_biofuels

    more evolution theory at work in society:
    http://www.actionbioscience.org/newfrontiers/bull.html

    practical applications from creationism theory:

    zip. nil. nada. big 0
  13. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12694
    25 Jun '12 07:52
    Originally posted by VoidSpirit
    evolution theory applied to medicine:
    http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/medicine_01

    evolution theory applied to agriculture:
    http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/agriculture_01

    evolution theory applied to conservation:
    http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/conservation_01

    evolution theory ...[text shortened]... ontiers/bull.html

    practical applications from creationism theory:

    zip. nil. nada. big 0
    This is all made up after the fact by evolutionists. The medical scientists say they do not even think about evolution while doing their research.

    http://scienceagainstevolution.org/v13i11f.htm
  14. Joined
    10 Jun '11
    Moves
    3829
    26 Jun '12 00:50
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    This is all made up after the fact by evolutionists. The medical scientists say they do not even think about evolution while doing their research.

    http://scienceagainstevolution.org/v13i11f.htm
    there is nothing scientific in your link source. the practical applications of evolution remain unassailed, and you remain a douche.
  15. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12694
    27 Jun '12 06:583 edits
    Originally posted by VoidSpirit
    there is nothing scientific in your link source. the practical applications of evolution remain unassailed, and you remain a douche.
    I think you will like this. He can be your young hero doing battle with my young hero.

    YouTube

    P.S. The following is the video he was arguing against from my young hero:
    YouTube
Back to Top