Can beliefs change?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
What is wrong with you fruitloops? let me try to spell it out for you once AGAIN and see if you can grasp it this time, a complete SPIRITUAL METAMORPHOSIS took place, in the case of fishing, it no longer became the prime pursuit in life, after all, Christ did teach that the heavenly father provided for the birds of the heavens and would do for those ...[text shortened]... ng faith. They stopped having homosexual sex, how hard can it be to grasp? Thanks??? No problem.

Fruitloops? What's with the name calling, kiltwearing freakshow?

You're making no sense, man.

So fishermen just sat in church all day and god would just slap a peace of fish on their plate everyday? Fishing became a hobby? First you say they stopped fishing, next you say fishing was no longer the prime pursuit. Which is it, you wacko, did they stop altogether or did they just install a sort of fishing quota?

Oh, right, I forgot, one is only homosexual whilst one is actually having sex with another of the same gender. In between having sex one is non-sexual. When one is masturbating, one is monosexual. Great stuff.

And still, the Greeks. What's with the Greeks? Did they stop being Greek altogether, or did being Greek stop being the prime pursuit in life?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
men who submit to homosexual acts, men who practice homosexuality

Sorry to bug you, oh ye of great wisdumb, but why are these two phrases separate? What's the difference?

Originally posted by Great King Rat
Sorry to bug you, oh ye of great wisdumb, but why are these two phrases separate? What's the difference?

there will be different words in the original manuscripts Great Fruit Bat.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
there will be different words in the original manuscripts Great Fruit Bat.

Why were there different words in the original manuscripts, Raving Robert? Is that because God wanted it to be as clear as possible?

Originally posted by Great King Rat
Why were there different words in the original manuscripts, Raving Robert? Is that because God wanted it to be as clear as possible?

Sigh great fruit fly, different nuances of meaning.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Sigh great fruit fly, different nuances of meaning.

What were the different nuances of meaning, Rancid Roboto?

Originally posted by Great King Rat
What were the different nuances of meaning, Rancid Roboto?

look it up Great flim flam

Biblehub.com

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
look it up Great flim flam

Biblehub.com

Can't you tell me, Raggedy Ann?

Originally posted by Great King Rat
Can't you tell me, Raggedy Ann?

Oh for goodness sake rexilious rodentus,

http://biblehub.com/text/1_corinthians/6-9.htm

and certain commentaries :

http://biblehub.com/commentaries/1_corinthians/6-9.htm

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Oh for goodness sake rexilious rodentus,

http://biblehub.com/text/1_corinthians/6-9.htm

and certain commentaries :

http://biblehub.com/commentaries/1_corinthians/6-9.htm

In yer own words, Roberta Drag. Didn't they ever teach you that in that wooden shed you called a school? Stop spamming links like a mad man.

Originally posted by Great King Rat
In yer own words, Roberta Drag. Didn't they ever teach you that in that wooden shed you called a school? Stop spamming links like a mad man.

I am taking you to the source so that you may employ your own powers of discernment you wee sleekit cow'rin timrous beastie! There are essentially two words, one is given a lexical translation of effeminate but has connotations of 'sensual living', and the other is a clear reference to sodomy, thus the translations render the terms differently. If I was to translate it I would say that no pansies or homos will inherit Gods Kingdom.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I am taking you to the source so that you may employ your own powers of discernment you wee sleekit cow'rin timrous beastie! There are essentially two words, one is given a lexical translation of effeminate but has connotations of 'sensual living', and the other is a clear reference to sodomy, thus the translations render the terms differently. If I was to translate it I would say that no pansies or homos will inherit Gods Kingdom.

Why are there "essentially" two words, you bru... nefri... fragr... ah, nevermind, can't think of anything. Gotta sleep.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
... men who submit to homosexual acts, men who practice homosexuality, ...

Spelling Robbie!
Don't Americanise the language even if you do get independence!

Originally posted by Great King Rat
... but why are these two phrases separate? What's the difference?

Men who submit to homosexual acts are happy with the status quo.

Men who practice homosexuality want to improve.



😉

Originally posted by divegeester
I don't see why not. What's your view?

I don't see why not.
I think it incredibly difficult but not impossible.

I think some Christians believe it impossible.