Suzianne is okay with abortion.
Dive is okay with being a jerk and saying hell doesn't exist.
Eladar could care less about homeless people because it doesn't fit his political view.
Rajk preaches Jesus, but is himself a vulgar non example.
In this forum, we see so-called Christians who cherry pick the bible.
All above are guilty as charged.
Edit: let's not forget gays, they are fine now too.
@chaney3 saidI see Suzianne's stance on abortion as being a political [and secular] stance. I have asked her many times about how the Bible might support her stance ~ or at least not forbid it ~ but she's declined to explain. Is it an example of "cherry-picking"? As in, it involves a selective ignoring of the 'Do Not Kill' commandment? Maybe. But there's a debate about the start of life and viability etc. I see Suzianne's stance on abortion as being more regardless-of-the-Bible, rather than an example of "cherry-picking" the Bible.
Suzianne is okay with abortion.
...
In this forum, we see so-called Christians who cherry pick the bible.
@chaney3 saidAn idiot with a computer and internet access is becoming the most annoying thing on the planet.
Suzianne is okay with abortion.
Dive is okay with being a jerk and saying hell doesn't exist.
Eladar could care less about homeless people because it doesn't fit his political view.
Rajk preaches Jesus, but is himself a vulgar non example.
In this forum, we see so-called Christians who cherry pick the bible.
All above are guilty as charged.
Edit: let's not forget gays, they are fine now too.
1 edit
@chaney3 saidhomosexuality is a biological failure of hormones and or neurology development in the womb.
Suzianne is okay with abortion.
Dive is okay with being a jerk and saying hell doesn't exist.
Eladar could care less about homeless people because it doesn't fit his political view.
Rajk preaches Jesus, but is himself a vulgar non example.
In this forum, we see so-called Christians who cherry pick the bible.
All above are guilty as charged.
Edit: let's not forget gays, they are fine now too.
like the children born with an open heart or without developed
intestines.
they are not "okay". they are abnormal.
this does not mean they do not deserve social fairness but it does mean that they are "abnormal" and not normal.
the error of modern times is to treat "abnormality" as a political event.
be kind to all but do not allow politics to obstruct truth.
@chaney3 saidPhew. That's a relief.
Edit: let's not forget gays, they are fine now too.
Peace be with you.
@caesar-salad saidDon't waste my time fool.
Phew. That's a relief.
Peace be with you.
Post something useful.
@mister-moggy saidWow.
homosexuality is a biological failure of hormones and or neurology development in the womb.
like the children born with an open heart or without developed
intestines.
they are not "okay". they are abnormal.
this does not mean they do not deserve social fairness but it does mean that they are "abnormal" and not normal.
the error of modern times is to treat "abnormality" as a political event.
be kind to all but do not allow politics to obstruct truth.
Homos are abnormal???