Christianity taken to Court...

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
The kumquat post was no less ridiculous than Christianity in my opinion. I still have no idea what your post was supposed to mean.

No offense, but your opinion doesn't carry a whole lot of weight, if you are unable to distinguish a difference between the worship of inanimate objects and the worship of their Creator.

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
No offense, but your opinion doesn't carry a whole lot of weight, if you are unable to distinguish a difference between the worship of inanimate objects and the worship of their Creator.

But the kumquat is only feigning being inanimate, as a test.

Originally posted by scottishinnz
But the kumquat is only feigning being inanimate, as a test.

Tee-hee.

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Tee-hee.

Lol, yeah, in a stupid mood today - but I think you see the point?!

Originally posted by DeepThought
Breach of promise regarding an afterlife presumably, unless there is some more specific grievance against a particular church. As it's a civil case it would go on balance of probability, rather than proof beyond reasonable doubt, which from an agnostic point of view is quite an entertaining proposition. Sadly I doubt he'll get very far as he'll have to ...[text shortened]... liberately telling people to do the wrong things in order to reduce overcrowding in heaven...

Unbelievable!!!

How could they ever know heaven is going to be overcrowded 🙄

What are these people thinking anyway?

Unbelievable!!!

How could they ever know that heaven exists 🙄

What are these people thinking anyway?