- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by DasaIt is not a redundant question.
No comment to this redundant question.
Redundant implies that it's a question the answer to which is covered by the answer to
another question that has been asked.
As it is the only question being asked in the OP it can't by definition be redundant...
It is also a relevant question based on arguments you make.
So it very much deserves and needs to be answered if you were actually engaging in debate
and discussion of your beliefs rather than just spamming incoherent propaganda and hatred.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by RBHILLStars explode and in the process make every natural element heavier than iron.
How could something explode and creates something? unless of course there is a maker.
(having previously made all the elements up to iron out of hydrogen and helium)
Nobody makes the stars.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by RBHILLThe big bang wasn't a star exploding.
How can no star in the begining explode into something?
I was simply addressing your question of how something could explode without having a creator.
My answer to which is that stars explode, and don't have a creator.
As for the big bang...
There are several possibilities...
The universe including time started with the big bang singularity.
Thus there is no before the big bang, and no cause for the big bang.
Or there was something before the big bang and that an event in that something before caused the
event we think of as the big bang.
(there are a host of possibilities for this option)
Either way there is no need of, or evidence for a creator god or creator of any stripe.
There may or may not have been a cause, we can't yet tell.
1 edit
Originally posted by RBHILLYou are making too obvious, about what is going on in this thread. 😉
How could something explode and creates something? unless of course there is a maker.
Does "create" imply "creator"? If we say the BB "creates" are we imbuing it with agency? Choice? Or does the BB creating something, imply a creator behind it?
Even scientists and science writers, when speaking secularly or in publications, use the word "creation." Biologists speak of creatures, without being accused of a theistic interpretation. Only the most picky peer reviewer would call them on it.
Dasa is avoiding being drawn into such a discussion.
Originally posted by googlefudgehiroshima and nagasaki are good examples of explosions with out a creator.
The big bang wasn't a star exploding.
I was simply addressing your question of how something could explode without having a creator.
My answer to which is that stars explode, and don't have a creator.
As for the big bang...
There are several possibilities...
The universe including time started with the big bang singularity.
Thus there i ...[text shortened]... r god or creator of any stripe.
There may or may not have been a cause, we can't yet tell.