Originally posted by rwingettThe "freethinkers" obviously don't care a fig for what Jesus actually said. They only use him as a target on which to launch their vitriolic diatribes. They set up their straw men and paint Jesus' name on their backs.
The religious freaks obviously don't care a fig for what Dawkins actually said. They only use him as a target on which to launch their vitriolic diatribes. They set up their straw men and paint Dawkins' name on their backs.
Originally posted by rwingettYes, I think Dawkins' article has been grossly distorted throughout this thread.
The religious freaks obviously don't care a fig for what Dawkins actually said. They only use him as a target on which to launch their vitriolic diatribes. They set up their straw men and paint Dawkins' name on their backs.
Originally posted by ivanhoeThere in nothing technically wrong with the text in the OP. He says that technically there is nothing wrong with the concept that we could breed humans for, say, musical ability. He does not say we should do it though. I think he is right though, we should not be afraid of having the discussion; not being prepared for something, not discussing it, not thinking about it won't stop it from happening, it just means that we'd be unprepared for it if it ever did happen.
He isn't wrong about what ?
1 edit
Originally posted by scottishinnzMe and you have been talking about GOD before. Do you think I may belive that my GOD is wrong?
There in nothing technically wrong with the text in the OP. He says that technically there is nothing wrong with the concept that we could breed humans for, say, musical ability. He does not say we should do it though. I think he is right though, we should not be afraid of having the discussion; not being prepared for something, not discussing ...[text shortened]... 't stop it from happening, it just means that we'd be unprepared for it if it ever did happen.
Originally posted by geniusI very seldom ever mention Jesus, except to say that it's impossible to know for certain what it was he said. I think most of the things attributed to him in the bible are not authentic.
The "freethinkers" obviously don't care a fig for what Jesus actually said. They only use him as a target on which to launch their vitriolic diatribes. They set up their straw men and paint Jesus' name on their backs.
I save my best vitriol for god himself.
Originally posted by NordlysHey sexy, want to go out for some drinks and "conversation"? You are HAWT!!!!
I haven't read anything in this thread which sounded like people were defending Dawkins like God.
I don't have the energy today to reply to the posts directed at me. I hope I'll be able to come back to it tomorrow.