Debate and general discussion of the supernatur...

supernatural = NONE
religion = NONE
life after = NONE

Total = Hockus-pockus

Thanks!!!

Originally posted by masterloz
supernatural = NONE
religion = NONE
life after = NONE

I think the assumptions implicit in the words "life after" provide the key, but that's just me.

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
I think the assumptions implicit in the words "life after" provide the key, but that's just me.

k,

your thoughts sure!

life after is like life before, there was once nothing, so who can believe there is something afterwards???

Thanks!

Originally posted by masterloz
k,

your thoughts sure!

life after is like life before, there was once nothing, so who can believe there is something afterwards???

Thanks!

Hey Presto! And now we have life! Very interesting.

Originally posted by Halitose
Hey Presto! And now we have life! Very interesting.

Thats right, cus life simply finds away, as long as the conditions are right of cause. Where there is life, there is another and another.

Originally posted by masterloz
k,

your thoughts sure!

life after is like life before, there was once nothing, so who can believe there is something afterwards???

Thanks!

there was once nothing

A universal negative and logically impossible to prove and therefore gets deposited on the heap of unprovable assumptions.

so who can believe there is something afterwards

Based on an unfounded assumption, your conclusion doesn't hold any more water than a sieve would.

Thanks.

Originally posted by masterloz
Thats right, cus life simply finds away, as long as the conditions are right of cause. Where there is life, there is another and another.

Thats right, cus(sic) life simply finds away(sic)

I'm assuming you meant, "Because life simply finds a way", because I personally don't like cussing.

Another unfounded assumption combined with a logical contradiction. First you say there was nothing. Now you claim there is life, which "simply finds a way".

Originally posted by Halitose
[b]Thats right, cus(sic) life simply finds away(sic)

I'm assuming you meant, "Because life simply finds a way", because I personally don't like cussing.

Another unfounded assumption combined with a logical contradiction. First you say there was nothing. Now you claim there is life, which "simply finds a way".[/b]

correct!!! if live organisms can live on meteors deep in space then it is very possible for them to carry life through the universe, hey presto here we are, science not fiction!!!

Originally posted by masterloz
correct!!! if live organisms can live on meteors deep in space then it is very possible for them to carry life through the universe, hey presto here we are, science not fiction!!!

Live organisms!!!! Alert the SETI program!!! We've found the extra terrestrial!!!

Seriously, a couple organic compounds don't constitute life.

Originally posted by Halitose
logically impossible to prove and therefore gets deposited on the heap of unprovable assumptions.

I hope it will be comfortable there...sitting right next to Jesus Christ and the bible.

Originally posted by David C
I hope it will be comfortable there...sitting right next to Jesus Christ and the bible.

Yea just shows how blind some people are...

They sit right next to something and then they say it doesn't exist...

Total = Hockus-pockus

Speaking of hockus-pockus, Luther would happily agree with the etymological root : hoc est corpus meum.