- Joined
- 26 Feb 14
- Moves
- 1339
30 Apr 14
Originally posted by whodeyfish live in the sea /the sea is full of fish/therefore swim in the swimming pool not the sea cos its full of fish poo
Here is my argument.
1. Happy people to to heaven.
2. People who get drunk become happy.
3. Let's all get drunk and go to heaven.
My pastor says I'm way off base here. Where am I going wrong LemonJello?
30 Apr 14
Originally posted by whodeyIt was probably that left turn in Albuquerque.
Here is my argument.
1. Happy people to to heaven.
2. People who get drunk become happy.
3. Let's all get drunk and go to heaven.
My pastor says I'm way off base here. Where am I going wrong LemonJello?
30 Apr 14
Originally posted by whodeyI'm not LJ, but anyway...
Here is my argument.
1. Happy people to to heaven.
2. People who get drunk become happy.
3. Let's all get drunk and go to heaven.
My pastor says I'm way off base here. Where am I going wrong LemonJello?
1. Not all happy people go to heaven.
2. Not all drunk people become happy.
3. Oh, and of course, there is no heaven.
I can get behind the let's get drunk part, though.
30 Apr 14
1 edit
Originally posted by whodeyFor starters, that's not a deductive argument. A deductive argument is supposed to have a conclusion whose truth follows deductively, given the truth of the premises. But your conclusion (3) is not even a proposition; it's just some sort of exhortation. Your (3) does not have a truth value, any more than does that movie time jingle "Let's all go to the lobby..."
Here is my argument.
1. Happy people to to heaven.
2. People who get drunk become happy.
3. Let's all get drunk and go to heaven.
My pastor says I'm way off base here. Where am I going wrong LemonJello?
There are plenty more reasons why you are off base here, if you need.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
30 Apr 14
Originally posted by whodey2. People who get drunk become happy.
Here is my argument.
1. Happy people to to heaven.
2. People who get drunk become happy.
3. Let's all get drunk and go to heaven.
My pastor says I'm way off base here. Where am I going wrong LemonJello?
that's why he turns the water into wine baby!!!
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
30 Apr 14
Originally posted by whodey
Here is my argument.
1. Happy people to to heaven.
2. People who get drunk become happy.
3. Let's all get drunk and go to heaven.
My pastor says I'm way off base here. Where am I going wrong LemonJello?
*** Laughter ***
*** Applause ***
30 Apr 14
1 edit
Originally posted by whodeyHere is still my very favorite argument for God's existence. It's something of a case study in deductive logic.
Here is my argument.
1. Happy people to to heaven.
2. People who get drunk become happy.
3. Let's all get drunk and go to heaven.
My pastor says I'm way off base here. Where am I going wrong LemonJello?
(1) If God does not exist, then it is not the case that if I am evil, I will be punished after I die.
(2) I am not evil.
Therefore:
(3) God exists.
30 Apr 14
Originally posted by Great King RatYou don't sound like a happy drunk.
I'm not LJ, but anyway...
1. Not all happy people go to heaven.
2. Not all drunk people become happy.
3. Oh, and of course, there is no heaven.
I can get behind the let's get drunk part, though.
No heaven juice for you, sucker.
01 May 14
1 edit
Originally posted by LemonJelloKilljoy! ðŸ˜
For starters, that's not a deductive argument. A deductive argument is supposed to have a conclusion whose truth follows deductively, given the truth of the premises. But your conclusion (3) is not even a proposition; it's just some sort of exhortation. Your (3) does not have a truth value, any more than does that movie time jingle "Let's all go to the lobby..."
There are plenty more reasons why you are off base here, if you need.
1. My pastor says my premise is off base and is a Christian.
2. LJ agrees with my pastor.
3. LJ must be a Christian.